首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
【24h】

The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

机译:放射线立体分析和末端应力装置的结合导致前交叉韧带重建后膝关节松弛度测量的精度较差。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Several devices for measuring knee laxity following anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction exist, but the precision of the methods has never been optimal. Therefore, a new standardized protocol (NSP) was made, aiming at ensuring a reliable positioning of the Telos Stress Device (TSD) which theoretically could result in precise knee laxity measurements when using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in combination with TSD. METHOD: The TSD was applied to the knee of 30 healthy persons, using both the NSP and the official company instructions. The position of the stress arms of the TSD was marked following each measurement. The reliability of each protocol was calculated as the difference in length between the first and second markings. The NSP for the TSD was then used in a clinical study. Thirty-five patients underwent ACL reconstruction. Double measurements of knee laxity by RSA were performed at a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Using the NSP for TSD positioning, the prediction interval at the marking sites ranged from +/-0.4 to +/-1.1 mm. Following the company instructions, the prediction interval ranged from +/-0.8 to +/-3.9 mm depending on marking site. Thus, the precision of positioning the stress arms of the TSD was improved at all marking sites using the NSP compared with the original company protocol. The double measurements of the knee laxity in the clinical study resulted in a mean difference of 0.0 mm and a prediction interval of +/-5.2 mm. CONCLUSION: Even though the NSP improved the positioning of the TSD on patients' extremities, the combination of NSP-TSD and RSA was not able to provide acceptable knee laxity measurements in a clinical setting compared with published precision data for other devices on the market. Therefore, the Telos Stress Device is not recommendable for use in knee laxity measurements following ACL reconstruction.
机译:目的:存在几种在前交叉韧带ACL重建后测量膝关节松弛的设备,但该方法的精度从未达到最佳。因此,制定了新的标准化协议(NSP),旨在确保Telos压力设备(TSD)的可靠定位,从理论上讲,当结合使用放射立体分析(RSA)和TSD时,可以精确测量膝盖的松弛度。方法:按照NSP和公司官方指示,将TSD应用于30名健康人的膝盖。每次测量后标记TSD应力臂的位置。每个协议的可靠性计算为第一和第二标记之间的长度差。然后将用于TSD的NSP用于临床研究。 35例患者接受了ACL重建。在三个月的随访中,通过RSA对膝盖松弛度进行了两次测量。结果:使用NSP进行TSD定位,标记位置的预测间隔范围为+/- 0.4到+/- 1.1 mm。按照公司的指示,根据标记部位的不同,预测间隔在+/- 0.8到+/- 3.9 mm之间。因此,与原始公司协议相比,使用NSP在所有标记位置上提高了TSD应力臂定位的精度。在临床研究中,对膝盖松弛度的两次测量导致平均差为0.0 mm,预测间隔为+/- 5.2 mm。结论:尽管NSP改善了TSD在患者四肢上的位置,但与市场上已发布的其他器械的精确度数据相比,NSP-TSD和RSA的组合在临床环境中仍无法提供可接受的膝盖松弛度测量。因此,不建议将Telos压力设备推荐用于ACL重建后的膝盖松弛度测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号