首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Probing forces of menisci: what levels are safe for arthroscopic surgery.
【24h】

Probing forces of menisci: what levels are safe for arthroscopic surgery.

机译:半月板的探查力量:什么水平对关节镜手术是安全的。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: to facilitate effective learning, feedback on performance during arthroscopic training is essential. Less attention has been paid to feedback on monitoring safe handling of delicate tissues such as meniscus. The goal is to measure in vitro probing forces of menisci and compare them with a theoretical maximum probing force (TMPF). METHOD: menisci samples of ten cadavers were mounted on force platforms to measure probing forces up to 20 N in three directions. Nineteen subjects participated: six novices (experience <60 arthroscopies), ten intermediates (>60 arthroscopies), and three faculty (>250 a year). All had to perform three tasks on each meniscus sample with an arthroscopic probe: push three times on the superior meniscal surface, perform one continuous run on the superior meniscal surface, and push three times on the inferior meniscal surface. The absolute maximum probing force (AMPF) was determined for each condition. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of experience on the force magnitude (P < 0.05). AMPFs were compared to the TMPF (estimated to be 8.5 N). RESULTS: the AMPF of the push task was on average 2.8 N (standard deviation (SD) of 0.8 N), of the continuous run task 2.5 N (SD 0.9 N), and of the pull task 3.9 N (SD 2.0 N). Significant difference was present between experts and novices (P < 0.05). The AMPFs are in the same order of magnitude as the TMPF. CONCLUSION: the results indicate the necessity of using a safety level for tissue manipulation when training arthroscopy and a value for is magnitude.
机译:目的:为了促进有效的学习,在关节镜训练期间对表现的反馈是必不可少的。对于监视对半月板之类的脆弱组织的安全处理的反馈,人们的关注较少。目的是测量半月板的体外探测力,并将其与理论最大探测力(TMPF)进行比较。方法:将十具尸体的半月板样品安装在测力平台上,以在三个方向上测量高达20 N的探测力。共有19名受试者参加:6名新手(经验<60例关节镜检查),10个中级(> 60例关节镜检查)和3名教师(每年250例)。每个人都必须使用关节镜探针对每个半月板样品执行三个任务:在上半月板表面上推动3次,在上半月板表面上进行一次连续运行,并在下半月板表面上推动3次。确定每种条件下的绝对最大探测力(AMPF)。进行了多元线性回归分析,以评估经验对力大小的影响(P <0.05)。将AMPF与TMPF进行了比较(估计为8.5 N)。结果:推式任务的AMPF平均为2.8 N(标准偏差(SD)为0.8 N),连续运行任务的AMPF平均为2.5 N(SD 0.9 N),而拉动任务的AMPF平均为3.9 N(SD 2.0 N)。专家和新手之间存在显着差异(P <0.05)。 AMPF与TMPF的数量级相同。结论:结果表明,在进行关节镜检查时,必须对组织操作使用安全级别,其值是幅度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号