...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology >Do the elongated eye stalks of Diopsid flies facilitate rival assessment?
【24h】

Do the elongated eye stalks of Diopsid flies facilitate rival assessment?

机译:Diopsid蝇的细长眼柄是否有助于竞争对手评估?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The elongated eye span of male Diopsid flies is a sexually selected character that scales positively with body size. Previously, the duration of agonistic contests was found to increase as rival body size and eye span disparities decreased. Hence, along with its role in mate choice, eye span seems to facilitate mutual assessment of rival size. However, such results are also expected in the absence of rival assessment, when each individual persists according to its own size-dependent internal threshold. Here, we reanalyze these contests to distinguish between these two hypotheses using two measures of size: body length and eye span. Mutual assessment predicts that contest duration should increase with loser size and decrease with winner size. In contrast, our results were more consistent with self-assessment: We found a positive relationship between loser size and contest duration, whereas winner size did not affect contest duration. Thus, flies did not appear to assess the size of their rivals, indicating that the mutual assessment function of eye span elongation may be less important than previously suspected.
机译:雄性双足龙果蝇的拉长的眼跨是性选择的性格,与体型成正比。以前,竞争性竞赛的持续时间随着竞争对手的体型和眼距差异的减少而增加。因此,连同其在选择配偶中的作用一样,睁眼似乎也有助于相互评估对手的体型。但是,如果每个人都根据其自身的大小相关的内部阈值坚持下来,那么在没有竞争者评估的情况下,也有望获得这样的结果。在这里,我们重新分析这些竞赛,以使用两个尺寸度量来区分这两个假设:体长和眼距。相互评估预测,比赛持续时间应随着失败者人数的增加而增加,而随着胜利者人数的减少而减少。相比之下,我们的结果与自我评估更为一致:我们发现失败者人数与比赛时间之间存在正相关关系,而胜利者人数并没有影响比赛时间。因此,苍蝇似乎没有评估其竞争对手的大小,这表明眼距延长的相互评估功能可能不如先前怀疑的重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号