Miscoding properties of 1,N(6)-ethanoadenine, a DNA adduct derived from reaction with the antitumor agent 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea.

摘要

1,N(6)-Ethanoadenine (EA) is an exocyclic adduct formed from DNA reaction with the antitumor agent, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU). To understand the role of this adduct in the mechanism of mutagenicity or carcinogenicity by BCNU, an oligonucleotide with a site-specific EA was synthesized using phosphoramidite chemistry. We now report the in vitro miscoding properties of EA in translesion DNA synthesis catalyzed by mammalian DNA polymerases (pols) alpha, beta, eta and iota. These data were also compared with those obtained for the structurally related exocyclic adduct, 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (epsilonA). Using a primer extension assay, both pols alpha and beta were primarily blocked by EA or epsilonA with very minor extension. Pol eta, a member of the Y family of polymerases, was capable of catalyzing a significant amount of bypass across both adducts. Pol eta incorporated all four nucleotides opposite EA and epsilonA, but with differential preferences and mainly in an error-prone manner. Human pol iota, a paralog of human pol eta, was blocked by both adducts with a very small amount of synthesis past epsilonA. It incorporated C and, to a much lesser extent, T, opposite either adduct. In addition, the presence of an A adduct, e.g. epsilonA, could affect the specificity of pol iota toward the template T immediately 3' to the adduct. In conclusion, the four polymerases assayed on templates containing an EA or epsilonA showed differential bypass capacity and nucleotide incorporation specificity, with the two adducts not completely identical in influencing these properties. Although there was a measurable extent of error-free nucleotide incorporation, all these polymerases primarily misincorporated opposite EA, indicating that the adduct, similar to epsilonA, is a miscoding lesion.