...
首页> 外文期刊>Mutation Research: International Journal on Mutagenesis, Chromosome Breakage and Related Subjects >Heritable and cancer risks of exposures to anticancer drugs: inter-species comparisons of covalent deoxyribonucleic acid-binding agents.
【24h】

Heritable and cancer risks of exposures to anticancer drugs: inter-species comparisons of covalent deoxyribonucleic acid-binding agents.

机译:暴露于抗癌药的遗传风险和癌症风险:共价脱氧核糖核酸结合剂的种间比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the past years, several methodologies were developed for potency ranking of genotoxic carcinogens and germ cell mutagens. In this paper, we analyzed six sub-classes of covalent deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) binding antineoplastic drugs comprising a total of 37 chemicals and, in addition, four alkyl-epoxides, using four approaches for the ranking of genotoxic agents on a potency scale: the EPA/IARC genetic activity profile (GAP) database, the ICPEMC agent score system, and the analysis of qualitative and quantitative structure-activity and activity-activity relationships (SARs, AARs) between types of DNA modifications and genotoxic endpoints. Considerations of SARs and AARs focused entirely on in vivo data for mutagenicity in male germ cells (mouse, Drosophila), carcinogenicity (TD50s) and acute toxicity (LD50s) in rodents, whereas the former two approaches combined the entire database on in vivo and in vitro mutagenicity tests. The analysis shows that the understanding and prediction of rank positions of individual genotoxic agents requires information on their mechanism of action. Based on SARs and AARs, the covalent DNA binding antineoplastic drugs can be divided into three categories. Category 1 comprises mono-functional alkylating agents that primarily react with N7 and N3 moieties of purines in DNA. Efficient DNA repair is the major protective mechanism for their low and often not measurable genotoxic effects in repair-competent germ cells, and the need of high exposure doses for tumor induction in rodents. Due to cell type related differences in the efficiency of DNA repair, a strong target cell specificity in various species regarding the potency of these agents for adverse effects is found. Three of the four evaluation systems rank category 1 agents lower than those of the other two categories. Category 2 type mutagens produce O-alkyl adducts in DNA in addition to N-alkyl adducts. In general, certain O-alkyl DNA adducts appear to be slowly repaired, or even not at all, which make this kind of agents potent carcinogens and germ cell mutagens. Especially the inefficient repair of O-alkyl-pyrimidines causes the high mutational response of cells to these agents. Agents of this category give high potency scores in all four expert systems. The major determinant for the high rank positions on any scale of genotoxic of category 3 agents is their ability to induce primarily structural chromosomal changes. These agents are able to cross-link DNA. Their high intrinsic genotoxic potency appears to be related to the number of DNA cross-links per target dose unit they can induce. A confounding factor among category 3 agents is that often the genotoxic endpoints occur close to or at toxic levels, and that the width of the mutagenic dose range, i.e., the dose area between the lowest observed effect level and the LD50, is smaller (usually no more than 1 logarithmic unit) than for chemicals of the other two categories. For all three categories of genotoxic agents, strong correlations are observed between their carcinogenic potency, acute toxicity and germ cell specificity. Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在过去的几年中,已经开发了几种方法来对遗传毒性致癌物和生殖细胞诱变剂的效力进行排名。在本文中,我们使用四种方法对效价等级上的遗传毒性剂进行了排序,分析了共包含37种化学物质以及另外四种烷基环氧化物的共价结合脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)的6个亚类: EPA / IARC遗传活性谱(GAP)数据库,ICPEMC试剂评分系统,以及DNA修饰类型和遗传毒性终点之间的定性和定量结构-活性和活性-活性关系(SAR,AAR)分析。 SAR和AAR的考虑完全集中于雄性生殖细胞(小鼠,果蝇)的致突变性,啮齿类动物的致癌性(TD50s)和急性毒性(LD50)的体内数据,而前两种方法结合了体内和体内的整个数据库体外诱变性测试。分析表明,了解和预测单个遗传毒性剂的等级位置需要有关其作用机理的信息。基于SAR和AAR,结合共价DNA的抗肿瘤药可分为三类。类别1包含主要与DNA中嘌呤的N7和N3部分反应的单官能烷基化剂。高效的DNA修复是主要的保护机制,因为它们对具有修复能力的生殖细胞的遗传毒性作用低且通常无法测量,并且需要高暴露剂量才能在啮齿动物中诱导肿瘤。由于细胞类型相关的DNA修复效率差异,因此发现了各种物种对这些药物产生不良反应的能力具有很强的靶细胞特异性。四个评估系统中的三个将第1类代理的等级低于其他两个类别的代理。除了N-烷基加合物外,第2类诱变剂还在DNA中产生O-烷基加合物。通常,某些O-烷基DNA加合物似乎被缓慢修复,甚至根本不修复,这使这类药物具有强大的致癌性和生殖细胞诱变性。尤其是O-烷基-嘧啶的修复效率低下,会导致细胞对这些试剂的高度突变反应。在所有四个专家系统中,此类代理商的效能得分均很高。任何类别的3类药物遗传毒性的高阶职位的主要决定因素是其主要诱导结构性染色体变化的能力。这些试剂能够交联DNA。它们高的内在遗传毒性效力似乎与它们可以诱导的每个靶剂量单位的DNA交联数有关。第3类药物之间的混淆因素是,遗传毒性终点常常发生在接近或处于毒性水平,并且诱变剂量范围的宽度(即,观察到的最低作用水平和LD50之间的剂量区域较小)(通常最多不超过1个对数单位)。对于所有三类遗传毒性剂,在其致癌效力,急性毒性和生殖细胞特异性之间均观察到强烈的相关性。版权所有1998 Elsevier Science B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号