首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology >Estrous synchrony in a nonseasonal breeder: adaptive strategy orTI Estrous synchrony in a nonseasonal breeder: adaptive strategy or population process?
【24h】

Estrous synchrony in a nonseasonal breeder: adaptive strategy orTI Estrous synchrony in a nonseasonal breeder: adaptive strategy or population process?

机译:非季节性繁殖者的发情同步:适应策略orTI非季节性繁殖者的发情同步:适应策略还是种群过程?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The idea that female mammals can manipulate the duration of each other's estrus in an effort to influence the degree of synchrony between their periods of sexual receptivity is a persistent and popularly held one. It is frequently cited as proof of pheromonal communication in humans and often invoked by models of female reproductive strategies more generally. Yet, to date, no tests of the evolutionary arguments put forward by proponents of the phenomenon have been undertaken. We addressed this deficit with an analysis of the reproductive demography of wild female chacma baboons, where variance in the temporal distribution of female receptivity is known to occur. Specifically, we tested the predictions that this variance will reflect female attempts to minimize 1) the risks of being monopolized by a single male or 2) the intensity of interfemale competition for males. Using model comparison, we found no evidence that male number or operational sex ratio had any influence on the distribution of female receptivity, the number of females in estrus, or the duration of female sexual swellings. Indeed, when modeling estrous overlap and cycling female number, we found that a simple nondeterministic model provided the best fit. We conclude, therefore, that variance in the temporal distribution of female receptivity is indicative of nothing more than a population process and that socially mediated synchrony is not a tangible adaptive phenomenon.
机译:雌性哺乳动物可以操纵彼此发情的持续时间以影响其性接受时期之间的同步程度的观点是一个长期存在且广为接受的观点。它经常被引用为人类信息素通讯的证据,并且通常被女性生殖策略模型所引用。但是,迄今为止,尚未对该现象的支持者提出的进化论进行检验。我们通过对野生雌性chacma狒狒生殖人口学的分析来解决这一缺陷,已知雌性时间分布会发生变化。具体而言,我们测试了以下预测:该差异将反映女性试图将以下因素减至最小的尝试:1)由单身男性垄断的风险或2)女性对男性的竞争强度。通过模型比较,我们发现没有证据表明男性人数或工作性别比率对女性接受能力的分布,发情中女性人数或女性性红肿持续时间有任何影响。确实,当对发情重叠和女性数循环建模时,我们发现简单的不确定性模型可以提供最佳拟合。因此,我们得出的结论是,女性接受能力的时间分布差异仅表示人口过程,而社会介导的同步并不是明显的适应现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号