首页> 外文期刊>Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte >(Re)cognizing postmodernity: Helps for historians-of science especially [(An)erkennung der postmodernit?t: Hilfen für historiker - und historiker der wissenschaften im besonderen]
【24h】

(Re)cognizing postmodernity: Helps for historians-of science especially [(An)erkennung der postmodernit?t: Hilfen für historiker - und historiker der wissenschaften im besonderen]

机译:(重新)认识后现代性:特别是对历史学家的帮助[(A)对后现代性的认识:对历史学家的帮助-特别是对科学史家的帮助]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Postmodernity, a historical era demarcated from modernity by a broad reversal in cultural presuppositions, is distinguished from postmodernism, an intellectual posture adopted by self-identified postmodernists early in postmodernity. Two principal features of postmodernity are addressed: first, the downgrading of science and the upgrading of technology in cultural rank - on which postmodernity and postmodernism are in accord; second, the displacement of the methodical, disinterested scientist, modernity's beau ideal, not by a fragmented subject as postmodernism claims, but by the single-minded entrepreneur, resourcefully pursuing his self-interest in disregard of all rules. The reversal in rank and role as between science and technology, setting in circa 1980, is a marker of the transition from modernity to postmodernity. That reversal is to be cognized primarily as rejection of rule-following, of proceeding methodically - 'methodism' being the cultural perspective that uniquely distinguished modernity - but also as rejection of disinterestedness, the quality of mind especially highly esteemed in modernity. Postmodernity is constituted by this transvaluation of values, whose well-spring is the egocentric, transgressive (hence 'risk taking'), postmodern personality and its anti-social presumptions regarding personhood. Within the history of science itself there has been since circa 1980 a corresponding turn of scholarly attention away from science to technology, and a growing distaste for social perspectives, reflected, i.a., in the rejection of causalist 'influence' explanations in favor of voluntarist 'resource' explanations.
机译:后现代性是通过文化前提的广泛逆转而从现代性划分出来的历史时代,与后现代主义不同,后现代主义是后现代早期由自我认同的后现代主义者所采用的一种理性姿态。后现代性的两个主要特征是:首先,科学的降级和文化等级技术的提高-后现代性和后现代主义是一致的。其次,有条不紊,无私的科学家,现代主义的美丽理想的取代,不是后现代主义所主张的一个零散的主题,而是一心一意的企业家在不顾一切规则的情况下,明智地追求自己的利益。大约在1980年,科学技术之间的地位和作用发生了逆转,标志着从现代到后现代的过渡。这种逆转主要应被理解为拒绝遵循规则,有条不紊地进行-“方法论”是独特地区分现代性的文化观点-但也应被视为对无私性的拒绝,即对现代性的高度重视。后现代性是由这种价值观的升值构成的,其源泉是以自我为中心,过犯(因此“冒险”),后现代人格及其关于人格的反社会假设。自1980年以来,在科学史自身内部,相应的学术注意力已从科学转向技术,并且对社会观点的厌恶情绪日益增加,例如,这体现在拒绝对保守主义的“影响力”解释有利于自愿主义的解释。资源的说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号