首页> 外文期刊>Molecular biology reports >The role of D-dimers in the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection
【24h】

The role of D-dimers in the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection

机译:D-二聚体在急性主动脉夹层诊断中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life threatening cardiovascular medical emergency with a poor prognosis. To explore the utility of D-dimers (DD) in the diagnosis of AAD, we performed a prospective study and conducted a meta-analysis of previous studies. 368 suspected patients were enrolled, including AAD n = 89, PE n = 12, AMI n = 167, normal controls n = 100. All patients had a DD test immediately after admission. We then performed a comprehensive computer search to identify studies investigating using DD as a screening tool for AAD. Finally, we pooled these data to estimate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) by using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. The DD concentrations in the AAD group were significantly higher than those in the AMI and normal control groups. However, the DD level of 500 ng/ml had a poor sensitivity of 51.7 % and specificity of 89.2 % in the diagnosis of AAD. Subgroup analyses found that DD only showed a well discriminative ability of distinguishing AAD patients from normal controls (specificity and positive LR was 97 % and 17.2, respectively). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative LR in our meta-analysis was 89, 68 %, 2.71, 0.07, respectively. In conclusion, our results suggest that plasma DD levels cannot add to the certainty of AAD diagnosis and it is not a good biomarker for AAD. In the future, prospective research on patients from many parts of the world is warranted to validate our findings. In addition, different controls, methods of plasma DD assays and other factors should be considered.
机译:急性主动脉夹层(AAD)是威胁生命的心血管内科急症,预后不良。为了探索D-二聚体(DD)在AAD诊断中的效用,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究并对以前的研究进行了荟萃分析。共有368名疑似患者入组,包括AAD n = 89,PE n = 12,AMI n = 167,正常对照组n =100。所有患者入院后均立即进行DD测试。然后,我们进行了全面的计算机搜索,以鉴定使用DD作为AAD的筛查工具进行研究的研究。最后,我们使用DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型汇总了这些数据,以估计敏感性,特异性,正和负似然比(LR)。 AAD组的DD浓度显着高于AMI组和正常对照组。然而,DD水平为500 ng / ml时,在诊断AAD中敏感性较差,仅为51.7%,特异性为89.2%。亚组分析发现,DD仅显示出很好的区分AAD患者和正常对照的能力(特异性和阳性LR分别为97%和17.2)。我们荟萃分析的合并敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性LR分别为89、68%,2.71、0.07。总之,我们的结果表明血浆DD水平不能增加AAD诊断的确定性,也不是AAD的良好生物标志物。将来,有必要对来自世界各地的患者进行前瞻性研究,以验证我们的发现。此外,应考虑不同的对照,血浆DD分析方法和其他因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号