...
首页> 外文期刊>Measurement Science & Technology >Measurement of air distribution and void fraction of an upwards air-water flow using electrical resistance tomography and a wire-mesh sensor
【24h】

Measurement of air distribution and void fraction of an upwards air-water flow using electrical resistance tomography and a wire-mesh sensor

机译:使用电阻层析成像和金属丝网传感器测量空气向上流动的空气分布和空隙率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Measurements on an upwards air-water flow are reported that were obtained simultaneously with a dual-plane electrical resistance tomograph (ERT) and a wire-mesh sensor (WMS). The ultimate measurement target of both ERT and WMS is the same, the electrical conductivity of the medium. The ERT is a non-intrusive device whereas the WMS requires a net of wires that physically crosses the flow. This paper presents comparisons between the results obtained simultaneously from the ERT and the WMS for evaluation and calibration of the ERT. The length of the vertical testing pipeline section is 3 m with an internal diameter of 50 mm. Two distinct sets of air-water flow rate scenarios, bubble and slug regimes, were produced in the experiments. The fast impedance camera ERT recorded the data at an approximate time resolution of 896 frames per second (fps) per plane in contrast with the 1024 fps of the wire-mesh sensor WMS200. The set-up of the experiment was based on well established knowledge of air-water upwards flow, particularly the specific flow regimes and wall peak effects. The local air void fraction profiles and the overall air void fraction were produced from two systems to establish consistency for comparison of the data accuracy. Conventional bulk flow measurements in air mass and electromagnetic flow metering, as well as pressure and temperature, were employed, which brought the necessary calibration to the flow measurements. The results show that the profiles generated from the two systems have a certain level of inconsistency, particularly in a wall peak and a core peak from the ERT and WMS respectively, whereas the two tomography instruments achieve good agreement on the overall air void fraction for bubble flow. For slug flow, when the void fraction is over 30%, the ERT underestimates the void fraction, but a linear relation between ERT and WMS is still observed.
机译:据报道,空气水流向上的测量是通过双平面电阻层析成像仪(ERT)和金属丝网传感器(WMS)同时获得的。 ERT和WMS的最终测量目标是相同的,即介质的电导率。 ERT是一种非侵入式设备,而WMS需要一线网以物理方式横穿流。本文介绍了从ERT和WMS同时获得的用于ERT评估和校准的结果之间的比较。垂直测试管道段的长度为3 m,内径为50 mm。在实验中产生了两种截然不同的空气-水流速情景,即气泡和团状状态。与丝网传感器WMS200的1024 fps相比,快速阻抗照相机ERT以每平面每秒896帧(fps)的大约时间分辨率记录数据。实验的建立基于对空气-水向上流动的公认的知识,特别是特定的流动方式和壁峰效应。由两个系统生成局部空气空隙率分布图和总空气空隙率,以建立一致性以比较数据精度。使用了空气质量和电磁流量计中的常规总体流量测量以及压力和温度,这为流量测量带来了必要的校准。结果表明,两个系统生成的剖面具有一定程度的不一致,特别是分别在ERT和WMS的壁峰和核心峰中,而这两种层析成像仪器在气泡的总气隙率上均取得了很好的一致性流。对于团状流,当空隙率超过30%时,ERT会低估空隙率,但仍观察到ERT与WMS之间存在线性关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号