首页> 外文OA文献 >Measurement of air distribution and void fraction of an upwards air-water flow using electrical resistance tomography and a wire-mesh sensor
【2h】

Measurement of air distribution and void fraction of an upwards air-water flow using electrical resistance tomography and a wire-mesh sensor

机译:使用电阻层析成像和线网传感器测量向上空气 - 水流的空气分布和空隙率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Measurements on an upwards air-water flow are reported that were obtained simultaneously with a dual-plane electrical resistance tomograph (ERT) and a wire-mesh sensor (WMS). The ultimate measurement target of both ERT and WMS is the same, the electrical conductivity of the medium. The ERT is a non-intrusive device whereas the WMS requires a net of wires that physically crosses the flow. This paper presents comparisons between the results obtained simultaneously from the ERT and the WMS for evaluation and calibration of the ERT. The length of the vertical testing pipeline section is 3 m with an internal diameter of 50 mm. Two distinct sets of air-water flow rate scenarios, bubble and slug regimes, were produced in the experiments. The fast impedance camera ERT recorded the data at an approximate time resolution of 896 frames per second (fps) per plane in contrast with the 1024 fps of the wire-mesh sensor WMS200. The set-up of the experiment was based on well established knowledge of air-water upwards flow, particularly the specific flow regimes and wall peak effects. The local air void fraction profiles and the overall air void fraction were produced from two systems to establish consistency for comparison of the data accuracy. Conventional bulk flow measurements in air mass and electromagnetic flow metering, as well as pressure and temperature, were employed, which brought the necessary calibration to the flow measurements. The results show that the profiles generated from the two systems have a certain level of inconsistency, particularly in a wall peak and a core peak from the ERT and WMS respectively, whereas the two tomography instruments achieve good agreement on the overall air void fraction for bubble flow. For slug flow, when the void fraction is over 30%, the ERT underestimates the void fraction, but a linear relation between ERT and WMS is still observed.
机译:报告了向上测量的空气水流的测量结果,这些测量是通过双平面电阻层析成像仪(ERT)和金属丝网传感器(WMS)同时获得的。 ERT和WMS的最终测量目标是相同的,即介质的电导率。 ERT是一种非侵入式设备,而WMS需要一线网以物理方式横穿流。本文介绍了从ERT和WMS同时获得的用于ERT评估和校准的结果之间的比较。垂直测试管道段的长度为3 m,内径为50 mm。实验中产生了两种截然不同的空气-水流速情景,即气泡和团状状态。与丝网传感器WMS200的1024 fps相比,快速阻抗照相机ERT以大约每平面896帧每秒(fps)的时间分辨率记录数据。实验的设置基于对空气-水向上流动的公认的知识,特别是特定的流动方式和壁峰效应。由两个系统生成局部空气空隙率分布图和总空气空隙率,以建立一致性以比较数据精度。使用了空气质量和电磁流量计中的常规大流量测量以及压力和温度,这为流量测量带来了必要的校准。结果表明,两个系统生成的剖面具有一定程度的不一致,尤其是分别在ERT和WMS的壁峰和核心峰中,而这两种层析成像仪器在气泡的总气隙率上均取得了很好的一致性流。对于团状流,当空隙率超过30%时,ERT会低估空隙率,但仍观察到ERT与WMS之间存在线性关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Olerni C; Jia J; Wang M;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号