首页> 外文期刊>Memory & cognition >Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory
【24h】

Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory

机译:转移标准不是识别记忆中逐项标准转移的困难部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recognition memory, participants often fail to shift their response criterion within a test even when they see cues signaling whether they should expect weak or strong memory (e.g., Stretch & Wixted Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1397-1410, 1998b). We contrasted two possible accounts for this failure to shift. The first assumes that shifting the criterion requires effortful processing, so participants are unwilling to make shifts even when they expect different levels of strength. The second assumes that participants are unwilling to decide which strength category is indicated by the cue for each trial, so their expectations for memory strength do not change across trials. Targets appeared in different test formats ("cues") depending on whether they were studied once (weak) or five times (strong), and lures were evenly divided between the two formats. Some participants had two response keys for "old" and "new" (2-key), and others had to use different keys to respond "old" for the two strength cues (3-key). The goal of the 3-key condition was to force participants to decide which strength cue was presented on each trial. The 3-key participants had a lower false alarm rate for lures shown with the strong than with the weak cue, but the 2-key participants showed no evidence of a criterion shift. Response times were unaffected by trial-by-trial criterion shifts. We conclude that participants willingly shift their response criterion on the basis of changes in expected strength, but they are unwilling to decide which strength to expect unless they are compelled to do this by other aspects of the task.
机译:在识别记忆中,即使参与者看到提示他们应该期待弱记忆还是强记忆的线索,他们也常常无法在测试中转移他们的反应标准(例如,Stretch&Wixted Journal of Experiment Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition,24、1397) -1410,1998b)。我们对比了两种可能的解释,以说明这种转移的失败。第一个假设改变标准需要费力的处理,因此即使参与者期望不同的强度水平,他们也不愿进行改变。第二个假设假设参与者不愿意决定每个试验的提示所指示的强度类别,因此他们对记忆强度的期望在各个试验中不会改变。根据目标被研究一次(弱)还是五次(强),目标以不同的测试格式(“提示”)出现,并且诱饵在两种格式之间平均分配。一些参与者对“旧”和“新”有两个响应键(2键),另一些参与者不得不对两个强度提示(3键)使用不同的键来对“旧”响应。三键条件的目标是迫使参与者决定在每次试验中呈现哪种力量提示。 3键参与者的提示误提示率较高,而弱提示提示的误报率较低,但是2键参与者则没有标准偏移的迹象。响应时间不受逐项试验标准转换的影响。我们得出的结论是,参与者愿意根据预期力量的变化而改变他们的反应标准,但是他们不愿决定期望哪种力量,除非他们被任务的其他方面强迫这样做。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号