首页> 外文期刊>cardiology research >Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sodium- Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
【24h】

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sodium- Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

机译:胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗 2 型糖尿病患者动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Beyond improving hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in adults with type 2 diabetes, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have been approved for reducing risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or multiple CV risk factors. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) also reduced the risk for the primary composite CV outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events. In the American Dia-betes Association (ADA) and European Association of Study in Diabe-tes (EASD) consensus report 2022, there is the description "In people with established atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) or with a high risk for ASCVD, GLP-1RA were prioritized over SGLT2i"; however, the evi-dence supporting such statement is limited. Therefore, we studied the superiority of GLP-1RA over SGLT2i for prevention of ASCVD from various viewpoints. We could not find a meaningful difference in the risk reduction in three-point MACE (3P-MACE), mortality due to any cause, mortality due to CV cause and nonfatal myocardial infarction between GLP-1RA and SGLT2i trials. The risk of nonfatal stroke de-creased in all five GLP-1RA trials; however, two of three SGLT2i trials showed an increase in risk of nonfatal stroke. The risk of hospitaliza-tion for heart failure (HHF) decreased in all three SGLT2i trials, and one GLP-1RA trial showed an increase in risk of HHF. The risk reduc-tion of HHF in SGLT2i trials was greater than that in GLP-1RA trials. These findings were consistent with current systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The risk reduction of 3P-MACE was significantly and negatively correlated with changes in HbA1c (R =-0.861, P = 0.006) and body weight (R =-0.895, P = 0.003) in GLP-1RA and SGLT2i trials. The studies using SGLT2i failed to reduce carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), the surrogate marker for atherosclerosis; however, several studies using GLP-1RA successfully reduced cIMT in patients with type 2 diabetes. Compared with SGLT2i, GLP-1RA had a higher probability of decreasing serum triglyceride. GLP-1RA have multiple vascular biological anti-atherogenic properties.
机译:除了改善成人 2 型糖尿病患者的血红蛋白 A1c (HbA1c) 外,胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂 (GLP-1RA) 已被批准用于降低确诊心血管疾病 (CVD) 或多种心血管危险因素的主要不良心血管事件 (MACE) 的风险。钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂 (SGLT2i) 也降低了 CV 事件高风险的 2 型糖尿病患者发生原发性复合 CV 结局的风险。在 2022 年美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 和欧洲糖尿病研究协会 (EASD) 共识报告中,有描述“在确诊动脉粥样硬化性 CVD (ASCVD) 或 ASCVD 高风险人群中,GLP-1RA 优先于 SGLT2i”;然而,支持这种说法的证据是有限的。因此,我们从不同角度研究了GLP-1RA在预防ASCVD方面优于SGLT2i。在GLP-1RA和SGLT2i试验之间,我们没有发现三点MACE(3P-MACE)的风险降低、任何原因导致的死亡率、CV原因引起的死亡率和非致死性心肌梗死的显著差异。在所有五项GLP-1RA试验中,非致死性卒中的风险均降低;然而,三项SGLT2i试验中有两项显示非致死性卒中风险增加。在所有三项SGLT2i试验中,因心力衰竭(HHF)住院的风险均降低,一项GLP-1RA试验显示HHF风险增加。SGLT2i试验中HHF的风险降低大于GLP-1RA试验。这些发现与目前的系统评价和meta分析一致。在GLP-1RA和SGLT2i试验中,3P-MACE的风险降低与HbA1c(R =-0.861,P = 0.006)和体重(R = -0.895,P = 0.003)的变化呈显著负相关。使用SGLT2i的研究未能减少颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT),这是动脉粥样硬化的替代标志物;然而,使用 GLP-1RA 的几项研究成功地降低了 2 型糖尿病患者的 cIMT。与SGLT2i相比,GLP-1RA降低血清甘油三酯的概率更高。GLP-1RA具有多种血管生物学抗动脉粥样硬化特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号