首页> 外文期刊>Military Medicine: Official Journal of AMSUS, The Society of the Federal Health Agencies >Are Commonly Used Premedical School or Medical School Measures Associated With Board Certification
【24h】

Are Commonly Used Premedical School or Medical School Measures Associated With Board Certification

机译:是与董事会认证相关的常用医学院或医学院的措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To determine if there is an association between several commonly obtained premedical school and medical school measures and board certification performance. We specifically included measures from our institution for which we have predictive validity evidence into the internship year. We hypothesized that board certification would be most likely to be associated with clinical measures of performance during medical school, and with scores on standardized tests, whether before or during medical school. Methods: Achieving board certification in an American Board of Medical Specialties specialty was used as our outcome measure for a 7-year cohort of graduates (1995-2002). Age at matriculation, Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT) score, undergraduate college grade point average (GPA), undergraduate college science GPA, Uniformed Services University (USU) cumulative GPA, USU preclerkship GPA, USU clerkship year GPA, departmental competency committee evaluation, Internal Medicine (IM) clerkship clinical performance rating (points), IM total clerkship points, history of Student Promotion Committee review, and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score and USMLE Step 2 clinical knowledge score were associated with this outcome. Results: Ninety-three of 1,155 graduates were not certified, resulting in an average rate of board certification of 91.9% for the study cohort. Significant small correlations were found between board certification and IM clerkship points (r = 0.117), IM clerkship grade (r = 0.108), clerkship year GPA (r = 0.078), undergraduate college science GPA (r = 0.072), preclerkship GPA and medical school GPA (r = 0.068 for both), USMLE Step 1 (r = 0.066), undergraduate college total GPA (r = 0.062), and age at matriculation (r = -0.061). In comparing the two groups (board certified and not board certified cohorts), significant differences were seen for all included variables with the exception of MCAT and USMLE Step 2 clinical knowledge scores. All the variables put together could explain 4.1% of the variance of board certification by logistic regression. Conclusions: This investigation provides some additional validity evidence that measures collected for purposes of student evaluation before and during medical school are warranted.
机译:目的:确定几种常用的医学院校和医学院校的措施与董事会认证绩效之间是否存在关联。我们特别将来自我们机构的措施纳入我们的实习年,这些措施具有可预测的有效性证据。我们假设,董事会认证最有可能与医学院校期间的临床表现评估以及标准化考试的分数相关,无论是在医学院校之前还是期间。方法:使用美国医学专业委员会专业委员会的委员会认证作为我们对7年毕业生(1995-2002年)的结果指标。入学年龄,医学院入学考试(MCAT)分数,大学本科平均绩点(GPA),大学本科科学GPA,统一服务大学(USU)累积GPA,USU执业资格GPA,USU执业年份GPA,部门能力委员会评估,内科(IM)职员临床表现评分(点),IM总体职员分数,学生促进委员会审查的历史记录以及美国医学许可考试(USMLE)步骤1得分和USMLE步骤2临床知识得分与该结果相关。结果:1,155名毕业生中有93名未通过认证,因此该研究队列的平均董事会认证率为91.9%。董事会认证与IM职员分数(r = 0.117),IM职员等级(r = 0.108),职员年GPA(r = 0.078),大学本科科学GPA(r = 0.072),职称GPA和医学之间存在显着的小相关性学校GPA(两者均为r = 0.068),USMLE步骤1(r = 0.066),大学本科总GPA(r = 0.062)和入学年龄(r = -0.061)。在比较两组(经董事会认证和未经董事会认证的人群)时,除MCAT和USMLE步骤2临床知识评分外,所有纳入变量均存在显着差异。通过逻辑回归,所有变量加在一起可以解释4.1%的董事会认证方差。结论:这项调查提供了一些额外的有效性证据,证明在医学院校之前和期间为学生评估目的而收集的措施是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号