首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Viewpoint: Availability of oestrogen receptor and HER2 status for the breast multidisciplinary meeting discussion; time to get it right
【24h】

Viewpoint: Availability of oestrogen receptor and HER2 status for the breast multidisciplinary meeting discussion; time to get it right

机译:观点:乳腺癌多学科会议讨论中雌激素受体的可用性和HER2状态;是时候做对了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The efficacy and pivotal role of the multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) in informed decision making is well established. It aims to provide a forum in which clinical evidence combines with individual patient data to create a personalized treatment plan. It does not fulfil this role adequately when undertaken without the full results of the patient's investigations being available. Neither doctor nor patient can make an informed decision about treatment options without knowledge of the tumour receptor status. Both targeted therapies and the aim to treat a majority of patients within clinical trials must now drive MDM decision making to be based on accuracy and best available treatment choices. A fully informed decision on treatment delayed by 1-2 weeks is clearly preferable to rushed time target-driven decisions made without the patient being offered a fully informed choice as ratified by a multidisciplinary team. Whilst the early anxiety of waiting for all relevant information to be available may be stressful for patients, not being sure that they have been offered fully informed treatment choices is also stressful and could cause longer lasting anxiety both during and after treatment. MDMs need to develop (along with targeted therapies) to retain their role as a forum whereby patients receive a correct, but specifically a full diagnosis and allow a fully informed discussion of all treatment options, including Pre-operative clinical trials. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:多学科会议(MDM)在知情决策中的功效和关键作用已得到充分确立。它旨在提供一个论坛,在该论坛中临床证据与患者个人数据相结合,以创建个性化的治疗计划。如果无法获得患者调查的全部结果,则无法充分发挥这一作用。在不了解肿瘤受体状态的情况下,医生和患者都无法做出明智的治疗选择决定。现在,针对性疗法和旨在治疗临床试验中大多数患者的目标都必须推动MDM决策基于准确性和最佳可用治疗选择。在没有经过多学科团队批准的情况下为患者提供充分知情的选择的情况下,完全延迟1-2周治疗的充分知情的决定显然比按时间目标驱动的紧急决定更好。尽管等待所有相关信息可用的早期焦虑可能会给患者带来压力,但不确定是否已为他们提供充分知情的治疗选择也会带来压力,并且可能在治疗期间和治疗后引起更长久的焦虑感。 MDM需要发展(以及针对性疗法)以保持其论坛的作用,使患者获得正确但特别是全面的诊断,并允许对所有治疗方案进行充分知情的讨论,包括术前临床试验。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号