首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Prognostic significance of peri-operative blood transfusion following radical resection for oesophageal carcinoma.
【24h】

Prognostic significance of peri-operative blood transfusion following radical resection for oesophageal carcinoma.

机译:根治性切除术后食管癌围手术期输血的预后意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion may exert an immunomodulatory effect and has been associated with early recurrence and decreased survival following resection for several gastro-intestinal malignancies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic influence of transfusion requirements following radical oesophagectomy for cancer. METHODS: A consecutive series of 235 patients undergoing subtotal oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy in a single centre from April 1990 to June 1999 were studied. RESULTS: The median age was 64 years (30-79) with a male to female ratio of 3:1. The predominant histological subtype was adenocarcinoma (n = 154) compared to squamous carcinoma (n = 81). To avoid the influence of surgical complications data were excluded from the 5.5% of patients suffering in-hospital mortality. In the remaining patients, median blood loss was 900 ml (200-5500) with 46% (103/222) requiring transfusion (median 3 units, range 2-21). Median survival of non-transfused patients was 36 months compared to only 19 months for those receiving transfusion (log-rank = 4.44; 1 df, P = 0.0352). Non-transfused patients had significantly higher 2 and 5-year survival rates of 62% and 41% respectively in contrast to only 40% and 25% in those receiving blood transfusion. Even after stratification of results according to disease stage or the presence of major complications, survival was significantly worse in those receiving transfusion. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that in addition to nodal status, > 4 units transfusion was an independent prognostic indicator. CONCLUSION: Post-operative transfusion is associated with a significantly worse prognosis following radical oesophagectomy. Meticulous haemostasis and avoidance of unnecessary transfusion may prove oncologically beneficial.
机译:简介:围手术期异体输血可能发挥免疫调节作用,并与多个胃肠道恶性肿瘤切除术后的早期复发和存活率降低相关。这项研究的目的是评估根治性食管切除术后输血需求对癌症的预后影响。方法:对1990年4月至1999年6月在单个中心连续进行的235例次全切食管切除术和两视野淋巴结清扫术的患者进行了研究。结果:中位年龄为64岁(30-79岁),男女之比为3:1。与鳞状癌(n = 81)相比,主要的组织学亚型是腺癌(n = 154)。为避免手术并发症的影响,5.5%的住院死亡率患者被排除在外。在其余患者中,中位数失血量为900毫升(200-5500),其中46%(103/222)需要输血(中位3个单位,范围2-21)。非输血患者的中位生存期为36个月,而接受输血的患者中位生存期仅为19个月(log-rank = 4.44; 1 df,P = 0.0352)。非输血患者的2年和5年生存率分别显着更高,分别为62%和41%,而接受输血的患者只有40%和25%。即使根据疾病阶段或主要并发症的存在对结果进行分层后,接受输血者的生存率也明显下降。多变量分析表明,除淋巴结状态外,输注> 4个单位是独立的预后指标。结论:根治性食管切除术后输血与预后明显差有关。严格的止血和避免不必要的输血可能在肿瘤学上是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号