...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series.
【24h】

The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series.

机译:N比值在胃癌患者中的预后价值:在大型多中心研究中的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIMS: The proportion between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N-ratio) has been proposed as an independent prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. In the present work we validated the reliability of N-ratio in a large, multicenter series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 1853 patients who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma. Survival of patients with >15 (Group-1, n=1421) and those with < or =15 (Group-2, n=432) lymph nodes examined was separately analyzed in order to evaluate the influence of lymph node dissection on disease staging. N-ratio categories (N-ratio 0, 0%; N-ratio 1, 1-9%; N-ratio 2, 10-25%; N-ratio 3, >25%) were determined by the best cut-off approach. RESULTS: At multivariate analysis, N-ratio (but not TNM N-category) was retained as an independent prognostic factor both in Group-1 and Group-2 (HR for N-ratio 1, N-ratio 2 and N-ratio 3=1.67, 2.96 and 6.59, and 1.56, 2.68 and 4.28, respectively). After a median follow-up of 45.5 months, the 5-year overall survival rates of TNM N0, N1 and N2 patients were significantly different in Group-1 vs Group-2. This was not the case when adopting the N-ratio classification, suggesting that a low number of excised lymph nodes can lead to patients being understaged using the N-category, but not N-ratio. Moreover, N-ratio identified subsets of patients with significantly different survival rates within TNM N1 and N2 categories in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: N-ratio is a simple and reproducible prognostic tool that can stratify patients with gastric cancer, including those cases with limited lymph node dissection. These data support the rationale to propose the implementation of N-ratio into the current TNM staging system.
机译:目的:已提出转移性淋巴结和检查淋巴结之间的比例(N比)是胃癌患者的独立预后因素。在当前的工作中,我们验证了大型多中心序列中N比的可靠性。患者与方法:我们回顾性分析了1853例行胃癌根治性切除术的患者的数据。为了评估淋巴结清扫对疾病分期的影响,分别分析了检查的> 15(第1组,n = 1421)和<或= 15(第2组,n = 432)患者的生存率。 。 N比率类别(N比率0,0%; N比率1,1-9%; N比率2,10-25%; N比率3,> 25%)由最佳截止值确定方法。结果:在多变量分析中,在第1组和第2组(N比率1,N比率2和N比率3的HR)中,N比率(但不是TNM N类别)被保留为独立的预后因素。 = 1.67、2.96和6.59,以及1.56、2.68和4.28)。中位随访45.5个月后,第1组与第2组的TNM N0,N1和N2患者的5年总生存率显着不同。采用N比率分类时情况并非如此,这表明切除的淋巴结数目少会导致患者使用N类别而不是N比率而处于低位。此外,N比率确定了两组中TNM N1和N2类别中存活率显着不同的患者亚组。结论:N比率是一种简单且可重现的预后工具,可以对胃癌患者(包括淋巴结清扫有限的患者)进行分层。这些数据支持了在当前TNM分级系统中提议实施N比率的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号