首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer: An international collaborative meta-Analysis
【24h】

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer: An international collaborative meta-Analysis

机译:FIGO IB1期至IIA期宫颈癌患者新辅助化疗的疗效:一项国际协作荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery (NCS) has not been well-established in FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer when compared with primary surgical treatment (PST). Thus, we performed a meta-Analysis to determine the efficacy of NCS in patients with FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer when compared with PST. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library between January 1987 and September 2010. Since there was a relative lack of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we included 5 RCTs and 4 observational studies involving 1784 patients among 523 potentially relevant studies. Results: NCS was related with lower rates of large tumor size (≥4 cm) (ORs, 0.22 and 0.10; 95% CI, 0.13-0.39 and 0.02-0.37) and lymph node metastasis (ORs, 0.61 and 0.38; 95% CI, 0.37-0.99 and 0.20-0.73) than PST in all studies and RCTs. Furthermore, NCS reduced the need of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in all studies (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.98), and distant metastasis in all studies and RCTs (ORs, 0.61 and 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89 and 0.38-0.97). However, overall and loco-regional recurrences and progression-free survival were not different between the 2 treatments. On the other hand, NCS was associated with poorer overall survival in observational studies when compared with PST (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.12-2.53). Conclusions: Although NCS reduced the need of adjuvant RT by decreasing tumor size and lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis, it failed to improve survival when compared with PST in patients with FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer.
机译:背景:与一级手术治疗(PST)相比,FIGO IB1期至IIA期宫颈癌的术前新辅助化疗(NCS)的疗效尚未确立。因此,我们进行了荟萃分析,以确定与PST相比,FIGS IB1期至IIA期宫颈癌患者的NCS疗效。方法:我们在1987年1月至2010年9月之间搜索Pubmed,Embase和Cochrane图书馆。由于相对缺乏相关的随机对照试验(RCT),我们在523项可能相关的研究中纳入了5项RCT和4项观察性研究,涉及1784例患者。结果:NCS与大肿瘤(≥4cm)(OR,0.22和0.10; 95%CI,0.13-0.39和0.02-0.37)和淋巴结转移(OR,0.61和0.38; 95%CI)的发生率较低相关,在所有研究和RCT中均比PST高0.37-0.99和0.20-0.73)。此外,NCS在所有研究中均减少了辅助放疗(RT,0.57; 95%CI,0.33-0.98),在所有研究和RCT中均减少了远处转移(OR,0.61和0.61; 95%CI,0.42- 0.89和0.38-0.97)。然而,两种治疗之间的总体和局部复发和无进展生存期无差异。另一方面,与PST相比,NCS与观察性研究的总生存期较差有关(HR,1.68; 95%CI,1.12-2.53)。结论:尽管NCS通过减小肿瘤大小和淋巴结转移以及远处转移而减少了辅助RT的需要,但与FIGO IB1期至IIA期宫颈癌患者相比,它不能提高生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号