首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Continued axillary sampling is unnecessary and provides no further information to sentinel node biopsy in staging breast cancer.
【24h】

Continued axillary sampling is unnecessary and provides no further information to sentinel node biopsy in staging breast cancer.

机译:持续的腋窝取样是不必要的,并且在分期乳腺癌中没有为前哨淋巴结活检提供进一步的信息。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become increasingly accepted as a diagnostic method to stage the axilla in breast cancer, selecting women with a positive sentinel node for completion axillary clearance. As SLNB became established, many surgeons supplemented SLNB to sample a minimum of four lymph nodes, on the assumption that the four-node technique is supported by randomised trial data. We hypothesised that the practice of undirected sampling to supplement SLNB adds little information to the status of the residual axilla. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five patients with early breast cancer were studied. Following successful identification of the sentinel node, 84 women had completion axillary dissection and 81 women had an axillary sample with at least four nodes available for pathological assessment. RESULTS: Following successful identification of the sentinel node in 165 patients, the false negative rate (FNR) was 2/44=4.5% (95% CI 0.6-15.5), sensitivity 42/44=95.5% (84.5-99.4) and negative predictive value (NPV) 121/123=98.4% (94.2-99.8). In the axillary dissection cohort, the FNR was 2/26=7.7% (0.9-25.1), sensitivity 24/26=92.3% (74.9-99.1) and NPV 58/60=96.7% (88.5-100). In the axillary sample group, the FNR was 0/18=0% (0-18.5), sensitivity 18/18=100% (81.5-100) and NPV 63/63=100% (94.3-100). The SLNB was the only positive node in 12/26 (46.2%) in the axillary dissection group and 10/18 (55.6%) in the axillary sampling group. There was no patient in the axillary sampling group where the sample node was positive and the sentinel node negative. CONCLUSION: Once SLNB is validated within the multidisciplinary unit, undirected sampling of the axilla following identification of the sentinel node(s) is unnecessary. The additional sampling of non-sentinel nodes has no role to play either in the assessment of a potential false negative SLNB nor as predictive information on the status of the residual axillary nodes.
机译:简介:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)已被越来越多地接受作为乳腺癌腋窝分期的诊断方法,选择前哨淋巴结阳性的女性进行腋窝清除。随着SLNB的建立,许多外科医生补充了SLNB来采样至少四个淋巴结,前提是随机试验数据支持四结点技术。我们假设,对SLNB进行无向采样的做法几乎没有为残留腋窝的状况提供任何信息。方法:对165例早期乳腺癌患者进行了研究。成功识别前哨淋巴结后,有84名妇女完成了腋窝淋巴结清扫术,有81名妇女进行了腋窝取样,至少有四个淋巴结可供病理评估。结果:在成功识别165例患者的前哨淋巴结之后,假阴性率(FNR)为2/44 = 4.5%(95%CI 0.6-15.5),敏感性42/44 = 95.5%(84.5-99.4)和阴性预测值(NPV)121/123 = 98.4%(94.2-99.8)。在腋窝清扫队列中,FNR为2/26 = 7.7%(0.9-25.1),敏感性24/26 = 92.3%(74.9-99.1)和NPV 58/60 = 96.7%(88.5-100)。在腋窝样品组中,FNR为0/18 = 0%(0-18.5),灵敏度18/18 = 100%(81.5-100)和NPV 63/63 = 100%(94.3-100)。 SLNB是腋窝解剖组中唯一的阳性淋巴结,分别为12/26(46.2%)和腋窝取样组中的10/18(55.6%)。腋窝采样组中没有患者的样本节点为阳性而前哨淋巴结阴性。结论:一旦在多学科单位内对SLNB进行了验证,就无需在确定前哨淋巴结之后对腋窝进行无方向的取样。非前哨淋巴结的额外采样在评估潜在的假阴性SLNB或作为残留腋窝结节状态的预测信息方面都没有作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号