首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Law Newsletter >Court Rules on Exploration Project Permitting
【24h】

Court Rules on Exploration Project Permitting

机译:法院关于勘探项目许可的规定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In an exhaustive 154-page decision disposing of all remaining claims against the State of Alaska, Superior Court Judge Eric A. Aarseth found that, in conjunction with the Pebble (mineral exploration) Project in Southwest Alaska, the state's Miscellaneous Land Use Permit (MLUP) system, as administered, and the state's Temporary Water Use Permit (T WUP) program, as administered, did not violate the provisions of Article VIII of the Alaska Constitution. Nunamta Aulukestai v. Alaska, No. 3AN-09-09173CI (Alaska Super. Ct. Sept. 26,2011), http ://law.alaska.gov/pdf/press/ 092811-Nunamta.pdf. In an earlier ruling Judge Aarseth had found that the two programs, essential to mineral exploration on state-owned land, were constitutional on their face. Id. at 8. His earlier ruling, however, allowed plaintiffs to adduce evidence to show that the programs were unconstitutional as applied. Id.
机译:最高法院法官埃里克·A·阿瑟斯(Eric A.Aarseth)在一份长达154页的详尽判决中,处理了对阿拉斯加州的所有其他索偿要求,发现阿拉斯加西南部的鹅卵石(矿产勘探)项目与该州的《杂项土地使用许可证》(MLUP) )系统以及该州的《临时用水许可证》(T WUP)计划均未违反《阿拉斯加宪法》第八条的规定。 Nunamta Aulukestai诉阿拉斯加案,第3AN-09-09173CI号案(阿拉斯加超级法院,2011年9月26日),http://law.alaska.gov/pdf/press/ 092811-Nunamta.pdf。 Aarseth法官在较早的裁决中发现,这两个对国有土地上的矿产勘探必不可少的计划在表面上是合宪的。 ID。但是,在8岁时,他的较早裁定允许原告提供证据,表明该程序违反了宪法。 ID。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号