...
首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Law Newsletter >Wyoming Supreme Court Interprets Deed to Be Ambiguous, Allowing Extrinsic Evidence of Parties' Intent
【24h】

Wyoming Supreme Court Interprets Deed to Be Ambiguous, Allowing Extrinsic Evidence of Parties' Intent

机译:怀俄明州最高法院解释契据含糊不清,允许当事人有意向的外在证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Whitney Holding Corp. v. Terry, 270 P.3d 662 (Wyo. 2012), is a case in which the Wyoming Supreme Court went to great lengths to arrive at a desired result notwithstanding the tortuous deed interpretation.The case involved the 1980 purchase by Whitney Holding Corporation (Whitney) of ranch property owned by Clarence and Peggy Terry (Terrys), through an exchange in which the Terrysacquired a property (Ranchester property) purchased by Whitney. The Ranchester property was sold by the Kaufmanns to Whitney, who traded it to the Terrys for their property. It was the reservations in the Kaufrnann/Whitney/Terry chain that caused the problem resulting in the case.
机译:惠特尼控股公司(Whitney Holding Corp.)诉特里(Terry),270 P.3d 662(怀俄明州,2012年)是怀俄明州最高法院竭尽全力以取得理想结果的一个案例,尽管该行为具有曲折性。该案涉及1980年的购买由惠特尼控股公司(Whitney)通过Clarence和佩吉·特里(Terrys)拥有的牧场财产通过交易所交换,特里斯收购了惠特尼购买的财产(兰切斯特财产)。考夫曼一家将兰切斯特的房产卖给了惠特尼,后者将其交易给特里夫妇。造成问题的原因在于Kaufrnann / Whitney / Terry连锁店的保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号