当事人的"不知陈述"是指不负证明责任的当事人对对方当事人所主张的事实向法院明确表示不知道或不记得的陈述,是介于自认与否认之间的一种特殊形态的陈述.从诚实信用原则、真实完全义务、具体化义务以及事案解明义务的法理分析,既要对违反上述法理的不知陈述行为进行合理规制,同时也应允许当事人因时间、认知等客观因素确实不知或不记忆而为不知陈述.在对当事人不知陈述行为效力的评价方式上,德国法的要件许可式在我国缺乏制度土壤,我国宜采用法官自由裁量的方式,法官应结合生活经验,考量所陈述的事实与当事人之间的关联程度、陈述的事实距离诉讼的时间间隔以及当事人不能作出明确陈述的原因是否合理等因素后,综合作出判断,既不能全盘推定为争执,也不能无限制地拟制为自认.%Party's "implied admission with vague" means that the parties who do not bear the burden of proof make a statement to the court that the facts advocated by the other party are not known or are not remembered.It is a special form of statement between self-denial and denial.From the jurisprudential analysis of the principle of good faith, truth obligation, specific obligation and obligation of explanation, it is necessary to reasonably regulate the act of indecision in violation of the above-mentioned legal principles.At the same time, the objective factors such as time and cognition lead the parties to make a statement.In the evaluation of the effectiveness for party's "implied admission with vague", the pattern in German law is not suitable for China.Our country should adopt the way of judicial discretion and the judge should combine with those factors of life experience, and the facts stated by the parties with the correlation of the parties, the time interval from the event happened to the court day and the reason why the parties can't make a definite statement with is reasonable, then to make a comprehensive judgment, neither completely presumed dispute nor unlimited be presumed to be implied admission.
展开▼
