首页> 外文期刊>Cancer causes and control: CCC >Breast cancer risk in older women: Results from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study
【24h】

Breast cancer risk in older women: Results from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

机译:老年女性患乳腺癌的风险:NIH-AARP饮食与健康研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Divergent risk factors exist for premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancers, but it is unclear whether differences by age exist among postmenopausal women. Methods: We examined relationships among 190,872 postmenopausal women, ages 50-71 years recruited during 1995-1996 for the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, in whom 7,384 incident invasive breast carcinomas were identified through 2006. Multivariable Cox regression hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for breast cancer risk factors by age (50-59, 60-69, ≥70 years). Results: The only factor showing significant statistical heterogeneity by age (p het = 0.001) was menopausal hormone therapy duration, but trends were apparent across all ages and the strongest association prevailed among women 60-69 years. Although other risk factors did not show statistically significant heterogeneity by age, we did observe attenuated relations for parity and late age at first birth among older women [e.g., HR for age at first birth ≥30 vs. 20-24 = 1.62 (95 % CI 1.23-2.14) for women 50-59 years vs. 1.12 (0.96-1.31) for ≥70 years]. In contrast, risk estimates associated with alcohol consumption and BMI tended to be slightly stronger among the oldest subjects [e.g., HR for BMI ≥35 vs. 18.5-24.9 = 1.24 (95 % CI 0.97-1.58) for 50-59 years vs. 1.46 (1.26-1.70) for ≥70 years]. These differences were somewhat more pronounced for estrogen receptor positive and ductal cancers, tumors predominating among older women. Breast cancer family history, physical activity, and previous breast biopsies did not show divergent associations by age. Conclusion: Although breast cancer risk factor differences among older women were not large, they may merit further consideration with respect to individualized risk prediction.
机译:背景:绝经前和绝经后乳腺癌存在不同的危险因素,但目前尚不清楚绝经后女性之间是否存在年龄差异。方法:我们检查了1995年至2006年间在NIH-AARP饮食与健康研究中招募的190,872名绝经后妇女(年龄在50-71岁之间)之间的关系,其中在2006年之前鉴定出7,384例侵袭性乳腺癌。多变量Cox回归危险比(HRs)根据年龄(50-59岁,60-69岁,≥70岁)估计乳腺癌危险因素的置信区间(CIs)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:绝经激素治疗持续时间是按年龄显示统计学异质性的唯一因素(p het = 0.001),但趋势在所有年龄段均很明显,且最紧密的关联性普遍存在于60-69岁的女性中。尽管其他风险因素并未显示出年龄上的统计学显着异质性,但我们确实观察到老年妇女的胎次和初次出生时晚年龄之间的关系已减弱(例如,初次出生时HR≥30vs. 20-24 = 1.62(95% CI为50-59岁女性的CI为1.23-2.14,而70岁以上女性为1.12(0.96-1.31)。相比之下,在年龄最大的受试者中,与饮酒和BMI相关的风险估计趋于略强[例如,BMI≥35vs. 18.5-24.9 = 1.24(95%CI 0.97-1.58)50-59岁相对于HR。 1.46(1.26-1.70)≥70年]。这些差异在雌激素受体阳性和导管癌中更为明显,这些肿瘤在老年妇女中占主导地位。乳腺癌家族史,体力活动和以前的乳腺活检没有显示出年龄差异。结论:尽管老年妇女的乳腺癌危险因素差异不大,但就个体化的危险预测而言,它们可能值得进一步考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号