...
首页> 外文期刊>Melanoma research >Features and management of pyrexia with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic melanoma
【24h】

Features and management of pyrexia with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic melanoma

机译:达拉非尼和曲美替尼联合治疗转移性黑色素瘤的发热特征及治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib (CombiDT) is an effective treatment for BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma; however, over 70% of patients develop drug-related pyrexia, and little is known about this toxicity. We sought to examine the features and management of CombiDT pyrexia. The association between pyrexia and patient demographics, disease characteristics and outcome variables was assessed in patients treated with CombiDT at a single institution. The clinicopathological features of pyrexic events were analysed. Fourteen of 32 (44%) patients developed pyrexia (temperature > 38.5°C). Pyrexia was recurrent in 11/14 (79%). The median time to pyrexia was 38 days. Pyrexia was not associated with age, sex nor disease burden, and did not correlate with RECIST response, progression-free nor overall survival. Paracetamol, NSAIDs and/or dose reduction (DR) were ineffective secondary prophylaxis for pyrexia, whereas corticosteroids were effective in all patients (n = 8), including two with multiple previous pyrexic events despite several DRs. In patients with previous DRs who commenced steroids (n = 3), CombiDT doses were re-escalated without pyrexia. Pyrexia is a frequent and recurrent toxicity with CombiDT, with no predictive clinical characteristics. Pyrexia does not correlate with clinical outcome. Neither DR nor antipyretics are effective secondary prophylaxis, whereas corticosteroids are effective, prevent DR and enable re-escalation of CombiDT dosing.
机译:dabrafenib和曲美替尼(CombiDT)的联合治疗可有效治疗BRAF突变型转移性黑色素瘤。但是,超过70%的患者会出现药物相关的发热,对此毒性知之甚少。我们试图检查CombiDT发热的特征和治疗。在单一机构对使用CombiDT治疗的患者评估了发热和患者人口统计学,疾病特征和结果变量之间的关联。分析了发热事件的临床病理特征。 32名患者中有14名(44%)出现发热(温度> 38.5°C)。发热在11/14复发(79%)。发热的中位时间为38天。发热与年龄,性别或疾病负担无关,并且与RECIST反应,无进展或总体生存率无关。扑热息痛,非甾体抗炎药和/或降低剂量(DR)不能有效地预防发热,而皮质类固醇对所有患者均有效(n = 8),包括两名尽管有多次DR也曾发生多次发热事件的患者。在以前接受过类固醇治疗的DR患者(n = 3)中,CombiDT的剂量在没有发热的情况下重新升高。发热是CombiDT的一种常见且反复发作的毒性反应,没有可预测的临床特征。发热与临床结果无关。 DR和退热药都不是有效的二级预防方法,而皮质类固醇有效,可预防DR并使CombiDT剂量重新升级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号