...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Comparative persistence of antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy: A STROBE-compliant retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Comparative persistence of antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy: A STROBE-compliant retrospective cohort study

机译:抗癫痫药在癫痫患者中的比较持久性:一项符合STROBE的回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared persistence of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) including carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, valproic acid, and phenytoin in an Asian population with epilepsy.A retrospective cohort study was conducted by analyzing Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Adult epilepsy patients newly prescribed with AEDs between 2005 and 2009 were included. The primary outcome was persistence, defined as the treatment duration from the date of AED initiation to the date of AED discontinuation, switching, hospitalization due to seizure or disenrollment from databases, whichever came first. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of non-persistence with AEDs.Among the 13,061 new users of AED monotherapy (mean age: 58 years; 60% men), the persistence ranged from 218.8 (gabapentin) to 275.9 (oxcarbazepine) days in the first treatment year. The risks of non-persistence in patients receiving oxcarbazepine (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83), valproic acid (0.88; 0.85-0.92), lamotrigine (0.72; 0.65-0.81), and topiramate (0.90; 0.82-0.98) were significantly lower than in the carbamazepine group. Compared with carbamazepine users, the non-persistence risk was higher in phenytoin users (1.10; 1.06-1.13), while gabapentin users (1.03; 0.98-1.09) had similar risk. For risk of hospitalization due to seizure and in comparison with carbamazepine users, oxcarbazepine (0.66; 0.58-0.74) and lamotrigine (0.46; 0.35-0.62) users had lower risk, while phenytoin (1.35; 1.26-1.44) users had higher risk. The results remained consistent throughout series of sensitivity and stratification analyses.The persistence varied among AEDs and was better for oxcarbazepine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and topiramate, but worse for phenytoin when compared with carbamazepine.
机译:我们比较了包括卡马西平,奥卡西平,加巴喷丁,拉莫三嗪,托吡酯,丙戊酸和苯妥英的抗癫痫药物(AED)在患有癫痫病的亚洲人群中的持久性。纳入2005年至2009年之间新开具AED处方的成人癫痫患者。主要结果是持续性,定义为从开始AED到终止,更换,因癫痫发作或从数据库中撤出住院之日起的治疗时间,以先到者为准。使用Cox比例风险模型评估AED非持续性的风险。在13,061名新的AED单一疗法使用者中(平均年龄:58岁;男性占60%),持续性范围从218.8(加巴喷丁)到275.9(奥卡西平)第一个治疗年的天数。奥卡西平(调整后的危险比[HR],0.78; 95%CI,0.74-0.83),丙戊酸(0.88; 0.85-0.92),拉莫三嗪(0.72; 0.65-0.81)和托吡酯的患者存在非持续性风险(0.90; 0.82-0.98)明显低于卡马西平组。与卡马西平使用者相比,苯妥英钠使用者的非持续性风险较高(1.10; 1.06-1.13),而加巴喷丁使用者(1.03; 0.98-1.09)具有相似的风险。对于因癫痫发作而住院的风险,与卡马西平使用者相比,奥卡西平(0.66; 0.58-0.74)和拉莫三嗪(0.46; 0.35-0.62)使用者风险较低,而苯妥英(1.35; 1.26-1.44)使用者风险较高。在一系列敏感性和分层分析中,结果仍保持一致.AED的持久性各不相同,奥卡西平,丙戊酸,拉莫三嗪和托吡酯的持久性更好,而苯妥英与卡马西平相比则更差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号