...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Relatively Selective COX-2 Inhibitors Versus Coxibs for the Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury
【24h】

Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Relatively Selective COX-2 Inhibitors Versus Coxibs for the Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury

机译:网络荟萃分析比较相对选择性的COX-2抑制剂与coxib预防NSAID引起的胃肠道损伤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Currently 2 difference classes of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, coxibs and relatively selective COX-2 inhibitors, are available for patients requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy; their gastroprotective effect is hardly directly compared.The aim of this study was to compare the gastroprotective effect of relatively selective COX-2 inhibitors with coxibs.MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (from their inception to March 2015) were searched for potential eligible studies.We included randomized controlled trials comparing coxibs (celecoxib, etoricoxib, parecoxib, and lumiracoxib), relatively selective COX-2 inhibitors (nabumetone, meloxicam, and etodolac), and nonselective NSAIDs with a study duration 4 weeks.Comparative effectiveness and safety data were pooled by Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were ulcer complications and symptomatic ulcer. Summary effect-size was calculated as risk ratio (RR), together with the 95% confidence interval (CI).This study included 36 trials with a total of 112,351 participants. Network meta-analyses indicated no significant difference between relatively selective COX-2 inhibitors and coxibs regarding ulcer complications (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.47-3.27), symptomatic ulcer (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.09-3.92), and endoscopic ulcer (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.37-2.96). Network meta-analyses adjusting potential influential factors (age, sex, previous ulcer disease, and follow-up time), and sensitivity analyses did not reveal any major change to the main results. Network meta-analyses suggested that relatively selective COX-2 inhibitors and coxibs were associated with comparable incidences of total adverse events (AEs) (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.93-1.31), gastrointestinal AEs (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.25), total withdrawals (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.74-1.33), and gastrointestinal AE-related withdrawals (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.57-1.74).Relatively selective COX-2 inhibitors appear to be associated with similar gastroprotective effect and tolerability as coxibs. Owing to the indirectness of the comparisons, future research is required to confirm the study conclusion.
机译:目前,需要非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)治疗的患者可使用2种不同类别的环氧合酶(COX)-2抑制剂,coxibs和相对选择性的COX-2抑制剂。本研究的目的是比较相对选择性的COX-2抑制剂与coxibs的胃保护作用。从MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane库(从成立到2015年3月)进行搜索研究包括随机对照试验,比较了Coxibs(塞来昔布,etoricoxib,parecoxib和lumiracoxib),相对选择性的COX-2抑制剂(萘丁美酮,美洛昔康和依托度酸)和非选择性NSAIDs,研究持续时间为4周。比较有效性和安全性数据通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析汇总。主要结局为溃疡并发症和症状性溃疡。总结效应大小作为风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)进行计算。该研究包括36个试验,共有112,351名参与者。网络荟萃分析表明,相对选择性的COX-2抑制剂和coxib在溃疡并发症(RR,1.38; 95%CI,0.47-3.27),症状性溃疡(RR,1.02; 95%CI,0.09-3.92)之间无显着差异,内镜溃疡(RR,1.18; 95%CI,0.37-2.96)。网络荟萃分析调整了潜在的影响因素(年龄,性别,先前的溃疡病和随访时间),而敏感性分析并未显示主要结果有任何重大变化。网络荟萃分析表明,相对选择性的COX-2抑制剂和coxib与总不良事件(AE)(RR,1.09; 95%CI,0.93-1.31),胃肠道AE(RR,1.04; 95%CI)的可比发生率相关(0.87-1.25),总戒断(RR,1.00; 95%CI,0.74-1.33)和胃肠道AE相关性戒断(RR,1.02; 95%CI,0.57-1.74)。相对选择性的COX-2抑制剂似乎具有与考昔布相似的胃保护作用和耐受性。由于比较的间接性,需要进一步的研究来确认研究结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号