首页> 外文期刊>Medicine, health care, and philosophy >Subject to empowerment: The constitution of power in an educational program for health professionals
【24h】

Subject to empowerment: The constitution of power in an educational program for health professionals

机译:有权赋权:卫生专业人员教育计划中的权力构成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Empowerment and user participation represents an ideal of power with a strong position in the health sector. In this article we use text analysis to investigate notions of power in a program plan for health workers focusing on empowerment. Issues addressed include: How are relationships of power between users and helpers described in the program plan? Which notions of user participation are embedded in the plan? The analysis is based on Foucault's idea that power which is made subject to attempts of redistribution will re-emerge in other forms. How this happens, and with what consequences, is our analytical concern. The analysis is contrasted with 'snapshots' from everyday life in a nursing home. The program plan communicates empowerment as a democracy-building instrument that the users need. It is a tool for providing expert assistance to the user's self-help. User participation is made into a tool which is external to the user him-/herself. Furthermore, the analysis shows that the plan's image of empowerment presupposes an 'élite user' able to articulate personal needs and desires. This is not very applicable to the most vulnerable user groups, who thereby may end up in an even weaker position. By way of conclusion, we argue that an exchange of undesirable dominating paternalism for a desirable empowerment will not abolish power, but may result in more covert and subtle forms of power that are less open to criticism. The paper offers insights that will facilitate reflections on the premises for practising empowerment-oriented health care.
机译:增强能力和用户参与是一种理想的力量,并且在卫生部门中具有很强的地位。在本文中,我们使用文本分析来研究针对以赋权为重点的卫生工作者的计划计划中的权力概念。解决的问题包括:在计划计划中如何描述用户和助手之间的权力关系?计划中嵌入了哪些用户参与概念?该分析基于福柯的思想,即受制于重新分配尝试的权力将以其他形式重新出现。这是如何发生的,及其后果是我们的分析关注点。该分析与养老院日常生活中的“快照”形成对比。该计划计划将赋予权力作为用户所需的民主建设手段进行传达。它是用于为用户的自助提供专家帮助的工具。用户参与成为用户自己外部的工具。此外,分析表明,该计划的授权形象以能够表达个人需求和欲望的“精英用户”为前提。这不适用于最脆弱的用户组,从而可能最终处于更弱的地位。作为结论,我们认为,将不希望的主导性家长制换成期望的授权不会废除权力,而是可能导致更多的隐蔽和微妙形式的权力,较少受到批评。本文提供的见解将有助于反思在实践以赋权为导向的卫生保健的前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号