...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Prognostic Implications of Diabetes in Patients With Left-Sided Endocarditis Findings From a Large Cohort Study
【24h】

Prognostic Implications of Diabetes in Patients With Left-Sided Endocarditis Findings From a Large Cohort Study

机译:一项大型队列研究发现左心内膜炎患者的糖尿病预后意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher incidence of infections, and those with bacteremia are more prone to develop sepsis and infective endocarditis (IE). Nevertheless, data concerning the impact of DM on the prognosis of patients with IE are limited and sometimes contradictory. We examined the impact of DM on the inhospital outcome of left-sided IE in a large cohort of patients. We studied 594 consecutive episodes of left-sided IE diagnosed at 3 tertiary care centers. They were divided into 2 groups: episodes in patients with DM (n = 114) and episodes in patients without DM (n = 480). We retrospectively analyzed the influence of DM therapy on patient outcome. Compared to patients without DM, patients with DM were older (67 +/- 10 vs. 60 +/- 15 yr; p < 0.001), less frequently male (53.5% vs. 67.9%; p = 0.004), and more commonly had chronic renal failure (23.9% vs. 6.9%; p < 0.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14.6% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.019). Enterococcus (14.9% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.011) and Streptococcus bovis (8.8% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.024) were isolated more frequently. In the univariable analysis, septic shock (29.2% vs. 16.4%; p = 0.005) and mortality (43.5% vs. 30.0%; p = 0.008) were more common among patients with DM than in those without. Considering the different treatments for DM, septic shock (33.3%; p = 0.011) and death (50.8%; p = 0.012) were more frequent in patients receiving oral medication to treat diabetes than in patients with the other treatment modalities. However, multivariable analysis showed that DM had an independent association with development of septic shock (OR 2.282; 95% CI 1.186-4.393), but it was not a predictor of inhospital mortality.
机译:糖尿病(DM)患者的感染率更高,而菌血症患者则更容易发生败血症和感染性心内膜炎(IE)。然而,关于DM对IE患者的预后的影响的数据是有限的,有时是矛盾的。我们在大量患者中研究了DM对左侧IE住院结局的影响。我们研究了在3个三级护理中心诊断出的594例连续发作的左侧IE的情况。他们分为两组:DM患者发作(n = 114)和无DM患者发作(n = 480)。我们回顾性分析DM治疗对患者预后的影响。与没有DM的患者相比,患有DM的患者年龄更大(67 +/- 10 vs. 60 +/- 15岁; p <0.001),男性的发病率较低(53.5%vs. 67.9%; p = 0.004),并且更常见患有慢性肾功能衰竭(23.9%vs. 6.9%; p <0.001)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(14.6%vs. 7.8%; p = 0.019)。肠球菌(14.9%vs. 7.4%; p = 0.011)和牛链球菌(8.8%vs. 3.8%; p = 0.024)分离率更高。在单变量分析中,DM患者中败血症性休克(29.2%vs. 16.4%; p = 0.005)和死亡率(43.5%vs. 30.0%; p = 0.008)比非DM患者更为常见。考虑到糖尿病的不同治疗方法,接受口服药物治疗的糖尿病患者的败血性休克(33.3%; p = 0.011)和死亡(50.8%; p = 0.012)比其他方式的患者更为频繁。但是,多变量分析表明,DM与感染性休克的发展有独立的关联(OR 2.282; 95%CI 1.186-4.393),但它并不是住院死亡率的预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号