首页> 外文期刊>Infectious diseases in clinical practice: IDCP >Left-Sided Endocarditis Caused by Staphylococcus aureus A Comparison of Clinical and Prognostic Factors of Patients With Native and Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis
【24h】

Left-Sided Endocarditis Caused by Staphylococcus aureus A Comparison of Clinical and Prognostic Factors of Patients With Native and Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis

机译:金黄色葡萄球菌引起的左侧心内膜炎自然和人工瓣膜心内膜炎患者的临床和预后因素比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of mortality in patients with infectious endocarditis. Despite intensive research, some debate still exists on risk factors for mortality and the role of valve replacement on outcome. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of cases of S. aureus endocarditis diagnosed with strict case definitions in a single institution and compared infection in patients with native and prosthetic valves. Results: Eighty-four patients with definitive left-sided endocarditis were analyzed. The incidence of left-sided endocarditis caused by S. aureus ranged from 2 to 4 cases per 10,000 admissions per year. The mitral valve was more commonly involved than the aortic valve (58% vs 34%). Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) was hospital acquired more frequently than native valve endocarditis (NVE) (21% vs 54%; odds ratio [OR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.63). Bacteremia during effective antimicrobial therapy (25% vs 57%; OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.65), cardiac failure (43% vs 68%; OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.92), and central nervous system complications (28% vs 36%; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.27-1.89) were more frequently observed in patients with PVE. The overall mortality was 33%, and it was lower in cases of NVE (28% vs 43%; OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.21-1.37). Patients without complications survived the infection, but a trend toward a higher mortality in patients who developed 1 (19%), 2 (40%), or 3 (83%) complications was observed (Spearman p = 0.568; P < 0.001). Valve replacement was more frequently performed in patients with PVE (37% vs 71%; OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.64). Among patients with NVE, no single complication was significantly associated with mortality, and we did not find survival advantage of surgical treatment. In cases of PVE, surgical treatment determined a survival benefit (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.33). Conclusions: Clinical and prognostic differences do exist between NVE and PVE due to S. aureus. The sum of cardiac, renal, and central nervous system complications was the main determinant of mortality. Although cardiac surgery did not determine a survival benefit in patients with NVE, valve replacement seemed to improve the survival rate in patients with PVE.
机译:背景:金黄色葡萄球菌是感染性心内膜炎患者死亡的主要原因。尽管进行了深入研究,但关于死亡率的危险因素以及瓣膜置换对结局的作用仍存在一些争论。方法:我们回顾性审查了在单一机构中诊断出具有严格病例定义的金黄色葡萄球菌性心内膜炎的病例,并比较了自然瓣膜和人工瓣膜患者的感染情况。结果:对84例确定性左侧心内膜炎患者进行了分析。金黄色葡萄球菌引起的左侧心内膜炎的发病率范围为每年每10,000例入院2到4例。二尖瓣比主动脉瓣更常见(58%比34%)。人工瓣膜心内膜炎(PVE)的发病率要高于天然瓣膜心内膜炎(NVE)(21%vs 54%;优势比[OR]为0.24; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.09-0.63)。有效抗菌治疗期间的细菌血症(25%vs 57%; OR,0.25; 95%CI,0.10-0.65),心力衰竭(43%vs 68%; OR,0.36; 95%CI,0.14-0.92)和中枢神经PVE患者更常见系统并发症(28%vs 36%; OR,0.72; 95%CI,0.27-1.89)。总死亡率为33%,在NVE病例中较低(28%比43%; OR为0.52; 95%CI为0.21-1.37)。没有并发症的患者在感染中幸存下来,但是观察到发生1(19%),2(40%)或3(83%)并发症的患者死亡率更高的趋势(Spearman p = 0.568; P <0.001)。 PVE患者更常进行瓣膜置换术(37%vs 71%; OR,0.24; 95%CI,0.09-0.64)。在NVE患者中,没有单一并发症与死亡率显着相关,并且我们没有发现手术治疗的生存优势。对于PVE,手术治疗可确定生存获益(OR,0.02; 95%CI,0.00-0.33)。结论:由于金黄色葡萄球菌,NVE和PVE之间确实存在临床和预后差异。心脏,肾脏和中枢神经系统并发症的总和是死亡率的主要决定因素。尽管心脏手术不能确定NVE患者的生存获益,但瓣膜置换术似乎可以提高PVE患者的生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号