...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
【24h】

Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.

机译:比较四种通过放射学检查评估患者有效剂量的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Three methods of indirect effective dose estimation were reviewed and compared to a direct effective dose determination method. An anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescence dosimetry were used to obtain dosimetric data associated with anterior-posterior (AP) abdominal radiography, posterior-anterior (PA) chest radiography, PA head radiography, and AP heart fluoroscopy. Effective dose was determined using: (i) organ specific dose values directly determined by thermoluminescence dosimeters, (ii) data published by National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) and entrance surface dose (ESD), (iii) NRPB data and dose area product (DAP), (iv) energy imparted derived from DAP. The effective dose values estimated from the Rando phantom measurements were 161, 32.3, and 8.4 microSv/projection for the abdomen, chest, and head radiographs, respectively. Cardiac fluoroscopy yielded an effective dose value of 111 microSv/min. The effective dose values obtained indirectly using NRPB data and DAP were in good agreement with directly assessed values in all simulated exposures (difference <8%). The effective doses using NRPB data and ESD values differed from directly assessed values by less than 15% for the radiographic exposures and 60% for heart fluoroscopy. The energy imparted method yielded 136, 31, and 6.6 microSv/projection for the abdomen, chest, and head radiographs, respectively, and 111 microSv/min for heart fluoroscopy. Indirect patient effective dose determination using the NRPB dosimetric data and the measured value of incident radiation allows for reliable patient effective dose estimates. The use of DAP rather than ESD is recommended because it yields accurate results even for complex radiologic exposures involving fluoroscopy. The value of energy imparted may be used for the accurate determination of patient effective dose, especially when specific organ dose values are not of interest. The calculation of energy imparted with the use of EAP provides a reliable starting point for estimation of effective dose from radiologic examinations for which dosimetric data are not provided by NRPB.
机译:回顾了三种间接有效剂量估计方法,并将它们与直接有效剂量确定方法进行了比较。拟人化的体模和热致发光剂量法用于获得与前后(AP)腹部放射线照相,前后(PA)胸部放射线照相,PA头部放射线照相和AP心脏荧光检查法相关的剂量学数据。有效剂量的确定方法是:(i)通过热发光剂量计直接确定的器官特定剂量值;(ii)国家放射防护局(NRPB)发布的数据和入射表面剂量(ESD);(iii)NRPB数据和剂量面积乘积( DAP),(iv)源自DAP的能量传递。根据Rando体模测量估计的腹部,胸部和头部X光片的有效剂量分别为161、32.3和8.4 microSv /投影。心脏荧光检查的有效剂量值为111 microSv / min。在所有模拟暴露中,使用NRPB数据和DAP间接获得的有效剂量值与直接评估的值非常吻合(差异<8%)。使用NRPB数据和ESD值的有效剂量与直接评估的值相差不到15%(放射线照相)和60%(心脏透视)。能量传递方法的腹部,胸部和头部X射线照片分别为136、31和6.6 microSv / min,心脏荧光透视图为111 microSv / min。使用NRPB剂量学数据和入射辐射的测量值间接确定患者的有效剂量可进行可靠的患者有效剂量估算。建议使用DAP而不是ESD,因为即使对于涉及荧光检查的复杂放射线照射,它也能产生准确的结果。所施加的能量值可用于准确确定患者有效剂量,尤其是当特定器官剂量值不重要时。使用EAP进行的能量计算为从放射学检查估算有效剂量提供了可靠的起点,而放射学检查没有NRPB提供剂量学数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号