...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine and science in sports and exercise >Predicting walking METs and energy expenditure from speed or accelerometry.
【24h】

Predicting walking METs and energy expenditure from speed or accelerometry.

机译:通过速度或加速度计预测步行MET和能量消耗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: a) Compare the predictive potential of speed and CSA(hip) (Computer Science Applications accelerometer positioned on the hip) for level terrain walking METs (1 MET = VO2 of 3.5 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) and energy expenditure (kcal.min(-1)); b) cross-validate previously published CSA(hip)- and speed-based MET and energy expenditure prediction equations; c) measure self-paced walking speed, exercise intensity (METs) and energy expenditure in the middle aged population. METHODS: Seventy-two 35- to 45-yr-old volunteers walked around a level, paved quadrangle at what they perceived to be a moderate pace. Oxygen consumption was measured using the criterion Douglas bag technique. Speed, CSA(hip), heart rate, and Borg rating of perceived exertion were also monitored. RESULTS: Speed explained 10% more variance of walking METs than CSA(hip). Speed and mass explained 8% more variance of walking energy expenditure (kcal.min) than CSA(hip) and mass. The best previously published regression equations predict our walking METs and energy expenditures within 95% prediction limits of +/- 0.7 METs and +/- 1.0 kcal.min(-1), respectively. Women paced themselves at a significantly higher mean speed (5.5 km.h(-1)) and intensity (4.1 METs) than their male counterparts (5.2 km.h(-1) and 3.8 METs). Both genders expended approximately 0.75 kcal.kg(-1) for every kilometer of level terrain walked. CONCLUSION: Speed-based MET and energy expenditure predictions during level terrain walking were more accurate than those utilizing CSA(hip).
机译:目的:a)比较水平地形行走METs(1 MET = VO2为3.5 mL.kg(-1).min(-1))的速度和CSA(hip)(位于臀部的计算机科学应用加速度计)的预测潜力。 )和能源消耗(kcal.min(-1)); b)交叉验证先前发布的基于CSA(hip)和基于速度的MET和能量消耗预测方程; c)测量中年人的自定步速,运动强度(MET)和能量消耗。方法:72名35至45岁的志愿者走过一个台阶,以他们认为适中的速度铺成四边形。使用标准道格拉斯袋技术测量氧气消耗量。还监测速度,CSA(臀部),心率和感知劳累的博格等级。结果:速度说明了行走MET的差异比CSA(臀部)多10%。速度和质量解释了步行能量消耗(kcal.min)比CSA(臀部)和质量多8%。先前发布的最佳回归方程可预测我们的行走MET和能量消耗分别在+/- 0.7 METs和+/- 1.0 kcal.min(-1)的95%预测极限内。女性的平均速度(5.5 km.h(-1))和强度(4.1 METs)明显高于男性(5.2 km.h(-1)和3.8 METs)。每走一公里的地形,这两种性别的花费都约为0.75 kcal.kg(-1)。结论:在水平地形行走过程中,基于速度的MET和能量消耗预测比使用CSA(hip)的预测更为准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号