...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical mycology: official publication of the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology >Evaluation of four pretreatment procedures for MALDI-TOF MS yeast identification in the routine clinical laboratory
【24h】

Evaluation of four pretreatment procedures for MALDI-TOF MS yeast identification in the routine clinical laboratory

机译:在常规临床实验室中评估四种用于MALDI-TOF MS酵母鉴定的预处理程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

MALDI-TOF MS-based yeast identification requires a pretreatment step for which four are described in the literature, i.e., direct smear, fast formic acid and two complete formic acid/acetonitrile extractions. In this study we compared the impact of these procedures on the performance of MALDI-TOF MS-based yeast identification of samples from colonies grown on Sabouraud or chromogenic media. A total of 103 yeast isolates recovered from clinical samples were identified in parallel using the four pretreatment procedures. The proportions of both correct identifications (regardless of LogScore values) and of reliable identifications (i.e., correct identifications with a LogScore ≥2, as recommended by the manufacturer) obtained with the four techniques were compared. Even if the proportion of correct identifications exceeded 85% independent of the pretreatment procedure, results obtained with complete formic acid/acetonitril extractions of colonies grown on Sabouraud media were significantly superior to those with smear and fast formic acid extraction procedures. If one considers only reliable identifications, then both smear and fast formic acid extraction procedures yielded lower (<40%) correct identification rates than the use of the two complete extraction procedures (>77%) of portions of colonies on both Sabouraud and chromogenic media. The data would indicate that the direct smear and fast formic acid procedures cannot be recommended due to the LogScore values which were continually below those recommended by the manufacturer for biological validation. Thus, complete extraction methods are better suited for MALDI-TOF MS-based yeast identification in the clinical laboratory setting although they are more labor-intensive.
机译:基于MALDI-TOF MS的酵母鉴定需要预处理步骤,文献中对此进行了描述,即直接涂片,快速甲酸和两次完整的甲酸/乙腈萃取。在这项研究中,我们比较了这些程序对基于MALDI-TOF MS的酵母鉴定从Sabouraud或发色培养基上生长的菌落样品的性能的影响。使用四种预处理程序并行鉴定了从临床样品中回收的总共103种酵母菌。比较了使用这四种技术获得的正确标识(无论LogScore值如何)和可靠标识(即,LogScore≥2,如制造商建议的正确标识)的比例。即使正确的鉴定比例超过了85%(与预处理程序无关),用甲酸/乙腈彻底提取在Sabouraud培养基上生长的菌落所获得的结果也明显优于采用涂片和快速甲酸提取程序的结果。如果仅考虑可靠的鉴定,那么涂片法和快速甲酸提取法所产生的正确鉴定率均低于使用Sabouraud和发色培养基上菌落的两种完整提取法(> 77%)时的正确鉴定率。 。数据表明,由于LogScore值一直低于制造商为生物学验证所推荐的值,因此不建议直接涂片和快速甲酸程序。因此,完整的提取方法虽然劳动强度大,但更适合临床实验室中基于MALDI-TOF MS的酵母鉴定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号