首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Vicarious learning during simulations: Is it more effective than hands-on training?
【24h】

Vicarious learning during simulations: Is it more effective than hands-on training?

机译:模拟过程中的替代学习:比动手训练更有效吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context Doctor-patient communication skills are often fostered by using simulations with standardised patients (SPs). The efficiency of such experiences is greater if student observers learn at least as much from the simulation as do students who actually interact with the patient. Objectives This study aimed to investigate whether the type of simulation-based learning (learning by doing versus vicarious learning) and the order in which these activities are carried out (learning by doing → vicarious learning versus vicarious learning → learning by doing) have any effect on the acquisition of knowledge on effective doctor-patient communication strategies. In addition, we wished to examine the extent to which an observation script and a feedback formulation script affect knowledge acquisition in this domain. Methods The sample consisted of 200 undergraduate medical students (126 female, 74 male). They participated in two separate simulation sessions, each of which was 30minutes long and was followed by a collaborative peer feedback phase. Half of the students first performed (learning by doing) and then observed (vicarious learning) the simulation, and the other half participated in the reverse order. Knowledge of doctor-patient communication was measured before, between and after the simulations. Results Vicarious learning led to greater knowledge of doctor-patient communication scores than learning by doing. The order in which vicarious learning was experienced had no influence. The inclusion of an observation script also enabled significantly greater learning in students to whom this script was given compared with students who were not supported in this way, but the presence of a feedback script had no effect. Conclusions Students appear to learn at least as much, if not more, about doctor-patient communication by observing their peers interact with SPs as they do from interacting with SPs themselves. Instructional support for observing simulations in the form of observation scripts facilitates both vicarious learning and learning by doing. An observation script may focus learners' attention on the important aspects of doctor-patient communication and increase the content-related accuracy of peer feedback.
机译:背景技术通常通过使用标准化患者(SP)进行模拟来培养医患沟通技能。如果学生观察者从模拟中学到的东西至少与实际与患者互动的学生一样多,则这种体验的效率会更高。目的这项研究旨在调查基于模拟的学习的类型(边做边学还是替代学习)以及这些活动的执行顺序(边做边学→替代学习vs替代学习→做中学)是否有影响?获得有关有效的医患沟通策略的知识。此外,我们希望研究观察脚本和反馈公式脚本在多大程度上影响该领域的知识获取。方法样本由200名本科生组成,其中女性126名,男性74名。他们参加了两个单独的模拟会议,每个阶段为30分钟,随后是一个协作的对等反馈阶段。一半的学生先表演(边做边学),然后观察(反复学习)模拟,另一半则以相反的顺序参加。在模拟之前,之间和之后,对医患沟通的知识进行了测量。结果替代学习导致对医患沟通评分的了解要比边做边学。进行替代学习的顺序没有影响。与不以这种方式获得支持的学生相比,包含观察脚本还可以使接受该脚本的学生获得更多的学习,但是反馈脚本的存在没有效果。结论通过观察他们的同伴与SP的互动,学生似乎至少了解了更多甚至更多的医患沟通知识。以观察脚本的形式提供的对观察模拟的指导性支持,有利于替代学习和边做边学。观察脚本可以将学习者的注意力集中在医患沟通的重要方面,并提高同伴反馈的内容相关准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号