...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >A mixed-methods study of interprofessional learning of resuscitation skills.
【24h】

A mixed-methods study of interprofessional learning of resuscitation skills.

机译:跨方法的跨专业学习复苏技能研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the effects of interprofessional resuscitation skills teaching on medical and nursing students' attitudes, leadership, team-working and performance skills. METHODS: Year 2 medical and nursing students learned resuscitation skills in uniprofessional or interprofessional settings, prior to undergoing observational ratings of video-recorded leadership, teamwork and skills performance and subsequent focus group interviews. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was administered pre- and post-intervention and again 3-4 months later. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between interprofessional and uniprofessional teams for leadership, team dynamics or resuscitation tasks performance. Gender, previous interprofessional learning experience, professional background and previous leadership experience had no significant effect. Interview analysis showed broad support for interprofessional education (IPE) matched to clinical reality with perceived benefits for teamwork, communication and improved understanding of roles and perspectives. Concerns included inappropriate role adoption, hierarchy issues, professional identity and the timing of IPE episodes. The RIPLS subscales for professional identity and team-working increased significantly post-intervention for interprofessional groups but returned to pre-test levels by 3-4 months. However, interviews showed interprofessional groups retained a 'residual positivity' towards IPE, more so than uniprofessional groups. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention based on common, relevant, shared learning outcomes set in a realistic educational context can work with students who have differing levels of previous IPE and skills training experience. Qualitatively, positive attitudes outlast quantitative changes measured using the RIPLS. Further quantitative and qualitative work is required to examine other domains of learning, the timing of interventions and impact on attitudes towards IPE.
机译:目的:本研究旨在确定专业间复苏技能教学对医学和护理专业学生的态度,领导才能,团队合作和绩效技能的影响。方法:在接受视频记录的领导,团队合作和技能表现以及随后的焦点小组访谈的观察评分之前,二年级医学和护理专业的学生在单职业或跨职业环境中学习了复苏技能。在干预前后,以及3-4个月后再次进行职业间学习准备量表(RIPLS)。结果:跨专业团队和单专业团队之间在领导力,团队动力或复苏任务绩效方面无显着差异。性别,先前的跨专业学习经验,专业背景和先前的领导经验没有显着影响。访谈分析显示,对跨职业教育(IPE)的广泛支持与临床现实相匹配,具有团队合作,沟通和对角色和观点的更好理解的明显好处。问题包括角色采用不当,等级问题,职业身份和IPE事件的发生时间。专业人士和团队合作的RIPLS分量表在干预后对专业团队的影响显着增加,但在3-4个月后恢复到测试前的水平。但是,访谈显示,跨职业群体对IPE保留了“剩余积极性”,比单职业群体更是如此。结论:在现实的教育环境中基于共同的,相关的,共享的学习成果进行的干预可以与具有不同先前IPE和技能培训经验水平的学生一起工作。从本质上说,积极态度比使用RIPLS衡量的定量变化持久。需要进一步的定量和定性工作,以研究其他学习领域,干预时间和对IPE态度的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号