首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >In the eye of the beholder: Student perspectives on professional roles in practice
【24h】

In the eye of the beholder: Student perspectives on professional roles in practice

机译:在旁观者眼中:学生对实践中专业角色的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context Learning about professional roles in clinical settings is confounded by the gap between espoused theory and the professional practice of the workplace. Workplace learning is grounded in that which is afforded to learners and individuals' engagement with those affordances. The meaning students make of the real-world performance of professional roles and how this relates to formal professionalism frameworks remain unclear. Construal of experience is individual. Professional roles are enacted in the eye of the beholder. In their reflections, student subjectivities, intentionalities and engagement with workplace affordances are revealed. Our research question was: How do students' perspectives of professional roles in practice, revealed through written reflections, relate to the formal professionalism curriculum? Methods Year3 students (n=108) wrote reflections during hospital and community placements. Thematic content analysis was performed. A priori categories based on the CanMEDS Physician Roles Framework were used to map content. Results A total of 107 students consented to the use of their reflections (n=315). The CanMEDS roles of Communicator, Professional and Scholar predominated. Students were seen applying prior knowledge to new situations and reflecting on them. For some, the confirmation of previous learning was the outcome; for others, the mismatch between practice and the formal curriculum led to the questioning of both. The roles of Manager, Collaborator and Health Advocate were less frequently reflected upon. Differences between the affordances of hospital and community placements were seen. Means to address findings are discussed with reference to Billett's duality of workplace learning. Conclusions Reflective narratives reveal how students construe professional roles in practice. Mapping the content of reflections to a competency framework confirmed the mismatch between the formal and enacted curricula. Billett's duality of workplace learning provides a useful lens through which to identify means to address this, through the structural aspects of access and guidance, and through the promotion of individual engagement and reflection. ? Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013.
机译:背景拥护理论与工作场所专业实践之间的鸿沟使对临床环境中专业角色的学习感到困惑。工作场所学习的基础是为学习者和个人参与这些能力提供的东西。学生对专业角色在现实世界中的表现以及与正式专业框架之间的关系尚不清楚。经验的建构是个人的。在旁观者的眼中制定了专业角色。在他们的反思中,揭示了学生的主观性,意向性和对工作场所津贴的参与。我们的研究问题是:通过书面反思,学生对实践中的专业角色的看法如何与正式的专业主义课程相关?方法3年级的学生(n = 108)在医院和社区实习期间写了一些感想。进行了主题内容分析。基于CanMEDS医师角色框架的先验类别用于映射内容。结果共有107名学生同意使用他们的反射(n = 315)。沟通,专业和学者的CanMEDS角色占主导地位。人们看到学生将先验知识应用于新情况并进行反思。对于某些人来说,对先前学习的确认是结果。对于另一些人来说,实践和正式课程之间的不匹配导致了两者的质疑。经理,协作者和卫生倡导者的角色很少得到反映。看到医院和社区安置的费用之间的差异。参考Billett对工作场所学习的双重性,讨论了解决发现的方法。结论反思性的叙述揭示了学生如何在实践中理解专业角色。将思考内容映射到能力框架中,确认了正式课程与已制定课程之间的不匹配。 Billett对工作场所学习的双重性提供了一个有用的视角,通过它可以找到途径,通过获取和指导的结构方面,以及通过促进个人参与和反思来解决此问题。 ?布莱克韦尔出版有限公司,2013年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号