首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Impact of teaching and assessment format on electrocardiogram interpretation skills.
【24h】

Impact of teaching and assessment format on electrocardiogram interpretation skills.

机译:教学和评估格式对心电图解释技能的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a core clinical skill that should be developed in undergraduate medical education. This study assessed whether small-group peer teaching is more effective than lectures in enhancing medical students' ECG interpretation skills. In addition, the impact of assessment format on study outcome was analysed. METHODS: Two consecutive cohorts of Year 4 medical students (n=335) were randomised to receive either traditional ECG lectures or the same amount of small-group, near-peer teaching during a 6-week cardiorespiratory course. Before and after the course, written assessments of ECG interpretation skills were undertaken. Whereas this final assessment yielded a considerable amount of credit points for students in the first cohort, it was merely formative in nature for the second cohort. An unannounced retention test was applied 8 weeks after the end of the cardiovascular course. RESULTS: A significant advantage of near-peer teaching over lectures (effect size 0.33) was noted only in the second cohort, whereas, in the setting of a summative assessment, both teaching formats appeared to be equally effective. A summative instead of a formative assessment doubled the performance increase (Cohen's d 4.9 versus 2.4), mitigating any difference between teaching formats. Within the second cohort, the significant difference between the two teaching formats was maintained in the retention test (p=0.017). However, in both cohorts, a significant decrease in student performance was detected during the 8 weeks following the cardiovascular course. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment format appeared to be more powerful than choice of instructional method in enhancing student learning. The effect observed in the second cohort was masked by an overriding incentive generated by the summative assessment in the first cohort. This masking effect should be considered in studies assessing the effectiveness of different teaching methods.
机译:目的:心电图(ECG)的解释是本科医学教育应发展的一项核心临床技能。这项研究评估了小组同伴教学是否比讲座更有效地提高了医学生的心电图解释技能。另外,分析了评估形式对研究结果的影响。方法:连续两个队列的4年级医学生(n = 335)在6周的心肺课程中接受传统的ECG讲座或相同数量的小组,近距离教学。课程前后,对心电图解释能力进行了书面评估。尽管此最终评估为第一个队列的学生提供了可观的学分,但在第二个队列中它只是形成性的。心血管病治疗结束后8周进行了未宣布的保留测试。结果:仅在第二批研究中,注意到了近等教学比讲课的显着优势(效果大小为0.33),而在进行总结性评估的情况下,两种教学形式似乎同样有效。总结性评估而非形成性评估使性能提升提高了一倍(Cohen d 4.9与2.4),从而减轻了教学形式之间的差异。在第二组中,两种教学形式之间的显着差异在保留测试中得以维持(p = 0.017)。但是,在这两个队列中,在心血管课程之后的8周内,学生的学习成绩均明显下降。结论:评估形式似乎在增强学生学习方面比选择教学方法更有效。在第二个队列中观察到的效果被第一个队列的汇总评估所产生的压倒性动机所掩盖。在评估不同教学方法有效性的研究中应考虑这种掩盖作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号