首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Life goals and health decisions: what will people live (or die) for?
【24h】

Life goals and health decisions: what will people live (or die) for?

机译:人生目标和健康决定:人们将为(或死)活吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Quality of life may represent not just quality of health but also the degree to which an individual achieves personally meaningful extrinsic goals unrelated to life duration that are not incorporated in the standard quality-adjusted life year model. The objectives of this study are to develop a typology of life goals and explore whether goal type is related to willingness to consider trading life years or health for goals. DESIGN: . Surveys of 50 Chicago-area residents and 101 inpatients. Outcomes. Participants provided up to 5 goals. For each, they reported 1) how long the goal might take to achieve, 2) whether they would prefer a shorter lifetime with certain goal achievement to their full lifetime without goal achievement, and 3) whether they would prefer lower quality of health with certain goal achievement to their full health without goal achievement. RESULTS: Participant goals were classified by 2 investigators into 7 broad categories: family, wealth, job, education, health/fitness, travel, and personal fulfillment. Respondents in both samples were more likely to be willing to trade life years (community odds ratio [OR] = 7.39, P=0.0004; patient OR=1.82, P=0.008) or health (community OR= 5.11, P = 0.0042; patient OR = 1.83, P = 0.0498) to achieve family goals than other types of goals. CONCLUSIONS: The authors derive a manageable typology of goals that may affect medical decisions and demonstrate interrater reliability. Because willingness to trade life years varies by type of goal, typical time-tradeoff assessments may be systematically influenced by respondents' goals.
机译:目的:生活质量可能不仅代表健康质量,而且还代表个人达到与寿命无关的个人有意义的外部目标的程度,这些目标并未纳入标准的质量调整生命年模型中。这项研究的目的是建立人生目标的类型,并探讨目标类型是否与考虑将生命年或目标的健康状况进行考虑的意愿有关。设计:。对50名芝加哥地区居民和101名住院病人进行了调查。结果。参与者提供了5个目标。他们为每个人报告了1)实现目标可能需要多长时间; 2)他们是否更愿意将实现某些目标的寿命缩短到没有目标实现的整个生命期;以及3)他们是否更愿意在某些条件下实现较低的医疗质量达到目标就可以完全健康,而没有目标。结果:2名调查人员将参与者的目标分为7大类:家庭,财富,工作,教育,健康/健身,旅行和个人成就感。两个样本中的受访者更愿意选择生命年(社区优势比[OR] = 7.39,P = 0.0004;患者OR = 1.82,P = 0.008)或健康状况(社区OR = 5.11,P = 0.0042;患者) OR = 1.83,P = 0.0498)以实现家庭目标,而不是其他类型的目标。结论:作者得出了一种易于管理的目标类型,可能会影响医疗决策并证明其间的可靠性。由于交易生命年的意愿因目标类型而异,因此典型的时间权衡评估可能会系统地受到受访者目标的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号