首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Evaluation of procedural skills training in an undergraduate curriculum.
【24h】

Evaluation of procedural skills training in an undergraduate curriculum.

机译:评估本科课程中的过程技能培训。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: A substantial proportion of medical students enter their intern year without any basic skills experience. Lack of experience is a significant source of stress for many junior doctors. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a basic procedural skills tutorial for Year 3 medical students on their competence in relevant skills at Year 5. SUBJECTS: The control group consisted of 93 medical students who completed Year 3 in 1996. The intervention group consisted of 92 medical students who completed Year 3 in 1997. The intervention group received a practical skills tutorial in Year 3; the control group did not. Both groups were assessed on their practical skills competence during Year 5. METHODS: A 3-hour practical tutorial on injection and suturing techniques was delivered to the intervention group. The effectiveness of the intervention was assessed by self-reported experience of giving injections, inserting sutures and sustaining needlestick injuries, and by teacher-rated competency in four basic procedural skills. RESULTS: Students who received the Year 3 tutorial were significantly more likely to record a satisfactory assessment for their performance in all four basic skills compared with students who did not receive the tutorial. They were less likely than controls to refuse invitations to give injections, but not invitations to insert a suture, during Years 4 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: A single session of formalised teaching in procedural skills in the early stages of a medical degree can have long-term effectiveness in basic skills competence and may increase students' confidence to practise their skills.
机译:语境:很大一部分医学生没有任何基本技能经验就可以进入实习期。缺乏经验是许多初级医生压力的重要来源。目的:评估三年级医学生的基本程序技能教程对他们在五年级时相关技能的影响于1997年完成3年级的医学生。干预组在3年级收到了实用技能教程;对照组没有。两组均在第5年评估了他们的实际技能能力。方法:向干预组提供了3小时的注射和缝合技术实用教程。通过自我报告的打针,插入缝合线和维持针刺受伤的经验以及教师对四种基本程序技能的评估能力,评估了干预措施的有效性。结果:与未接受该教程的学生相比,接受了三年级教程的学生在所有四个基本技能上的表现均获得了令人满意的评估。在四年级和五年级期间,他们比对照组更不愿意拒绝邀请进行注射,而拒绝邀请进行缝合的可能性较小。结论:在医学学位的早期阶段,一次关于程序技能的正规教学可能会长期基本技能能力的有效期,可能会提高学生练习技能的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号