首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Comparison of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional textbook methods for training in abdominal examination (Japanese experience).
【24h】

Comparison of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional textbook methods for training in abdominal examination (Japanese experience).

机译:比较计算机辅助教学(CAI)和传统教科书中腹部检查训练的方法(日本经验)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effects of computer-assisted, text-based and computer-and-text learning conditions on the performances of 3 groups of medical students in the pre-clinical years of their programme, taking into account their academic achievement to date. A fourth group of students served as a control (no-study) group. METHOD: Participants were recruited from the pre-clinical years of the training programmes in 2 medical schools in Japan, Jichi Medical School near Tokyo and Kochi Medical School near Osaka. Participants were randomly assigned to 4 learning conditions and tested before and after the study on their knowledge of and skill in performing an abdominal examination, in a multiple-choice test and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), respectively. Information about performance in the programme was collected from school records and students were classified as average, good or excellent. Student and faculty evaluations of their experience in the study were explored by means of a short evaluation survey. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, all 3 study groups exhibited significant gains in performance on knowledge and performance measures. For the knowledge measure, the gains of the computer-assisted and computer-assisted plus text-based learning groups were significantly greater than the gains of the text-based learning group. The performances of the 3 groups did not differ on the OSCE measure. Analyses of gains by performance level revealed that high achieving students' learning was independent of study method. Lower achieving students performed better after using computer-based learning methods. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that computer-assisted learning methods will be of greater help to students who do not find the traditional methods effective. Explorations of the factors behind this are a matter for future research.
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较计算机辅助,基于文本的学习和计算机与文本学习条件对三组医学生在其临床前几年的表现的影响,并考虑他们的学习成绩至今。第四组学生作为对照组(无学习)。方法:从临床前几年的培训课程中招募了参与者,这些培训课程来自日本的2所医学院,东京附近的吉知医学院和大阪附近的高知医学院。参与者被随机分配到4个学习条件,并在进行腹部检查的知识和技能研究之前,之后进行了多项选择测试和客观结构化临床检查(OSCE),分别进行了测试。从学校记录中收集有关该计划绩效的信息,并将学生分为平均,良好或优秀。通过简短的评估调查,探讨了学生和教师对其研究经验的评估。结果:与对照组相比,所有三个研究组在知识和绩效测量方面的表现均显着提高。对于知识测度,计算机辅助和计算机辅助加基于文本的学习组的收益显着大于基于文本的学习组的收益。 3个小组的表现在欧安组织的衡量标准上没有差异。通过绩效水平获得的收益分析表明,高成就学生的学习与学习方法无关。使用基于计算机的学习方法后,成绩较低的学生表现更好。结论:结果表明,计算机辅助学习方法将对那些认为传统方法无效的学生有更大的帮助。探索其背后的因素是未来研究的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号