首页> 外文期刊>Hong Kong journal of emergency medicine. >The Comparison between two Methods of Basic Life Support Instruction: Video Self-Instruction versus Traditional Method
【24h】

The Comparison between two Methods of Basic Life Support Instruction: Video Self-Instruction versus Traditional Method

机译:两种基本生命支持教学方法的比较:视频自我教学与传统教学

获取原文
       

摘要

Medical education is changing and evolving. Teachers need to re-evaluate their medical teaching practice to enhance student learning. The data about the ideal training method of Basic Life Support (BLS) is lacking. The goal of this study was to analyse the use and performance of video self-instruction (VSI) method in BLS, in order to develop an efficient BLS training method. Eighty-one undergraduate medical interns were enrolled in a prospective clinical study in 2011. They were divided into VSI group and traditional group. We provided the first group with a DVD containing a 20-minute training video while the second group took part in a 4-hour training class of BLS. Subjects participated in a pre-test and post-test based on 2010 American Heart Association Resuscitation guideline. The average scores of VSI group and the traditional group before training were 8.85±2.42 and 8.57±2.22 respectively (p=0.592). After training, the average scores of the VSI and the traditional group were 20.24±0.83 and 18.05±1.86 respectively. VSI group achieved slightly better scores compared with the traditional group (p<0.001). Training through VSI achieves more satisfying results than the traditional lecture method. VSI method can be considered a useful technique in undergraduate educational programs. Developing VSI can increase significantly the access to the BLS training. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2015;22:291-296).
机译:医学教育正在发生变化和发展。教师需要重新评估他们的医学教学实践,以增强学生的学习能力。缺乏有关基本生命支持(BLS)理想训练方法的数据。这项研究的目的是分析视频自我指导(VSI)方法在BLS中的使用和性能,以便开发一种有效的BLS培训方法。 2011年共有81名本科医学实习生参加了一项前瞻性临床研究。他们分为VSI组和传统组。我们为第一小组提供了DVD,其中包含20分钟的培训视频,而第二小组则参加了BLS的4小时培训班。受试者参加了根据2010年美国心脏协会复苏指南进行的前测和后测。训练前VSI组和传统组的平均得分分别为8.85±2.42和8.57±2.22(p = 0.592)。训练后,VSI和传统组的平均分数分别为20.24±0.83和18.05±1.86。与传统组相比,VSI组得分略高(p <0.001)。通过VSI进行的培训比传统的讲课方法可获得更令人满意的结果。 VSI方法可以被认为是本科教育课程中的一种有用技术。开发VSI可以显着增加获得BLS培训的机会。 (香港医学杂志.2015; 22:291-296)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号