首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review.
【24h】

Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review.

机译:日常实践中的医生绩效评估:对医生有帮助吗?系统的审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Continuous assessment of individual performance of doctors is crucial for life-long learning and quality of care. Policy-makers and health educators should have good insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the methods available. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the feasibility of methods, the psychometric properties of instruments that are especially important for summative assessments, and the effectiveness of methods serving formative assessments used in routine practise to assess the performance of individual doctors. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE (1966-January 2006), PsychINFO (1972-January 2006), CINAHL (1982-January 2006), EMBASE (1980-January 2006) and Cochrane (1966-2006) databases for English language articles, and supplemented this with a hand-search of reference lists of relevant studies and bibliographies of review articles. Studies that aimed to assess the performance of individual doctors in routine practise were included. Two reviewers independently abstracted data regarding study design, setting and findings related to reliability, validity, feasibility and effectiveness using a standard data abstraction form. RESULTS: A total of 64 articles met our inclusion criteria. We observed 6 different methods of evaluating performance: simulated patients; video observation; direct observation; peer assessment; audit of medical records, and portfolio or appraisal. Peer assessment is the most feasible method in terms of costs and time. Little psychometric assessment of the instruments has been undertaken so far. Effectiveness of formative assessments is poorly studied. All systems but 2 rely on a single method to assess performance. DISCUSSION: There is substantial potential to assess performance of doctors in routine practise. The longterm impact and effectiveness of formative performance assessments on education and quality of care remains hardly known. Future research designs need to pay special attention to unmasking effectiveness in terms of performance improvement.
机译:背景:持续评估医生的个人表现对于终身学习和护理质量至关重要。政策制定者和健康教育者应该对现有方法的优缺点有深刻的认识。这项研究的目的是系统地评估方法的可行性,对于汇总评估尤其重要的仪器的心理计量特性,以及在常规实践中用于评估个别医生绩效的服务于形成性评估的方法的有效性。方法:我们在MEDLINE(1966-2006年1月),PsychINFO(1972-2006年1月),CINAHL(1982-2006年1月),EMBASE(1980-2006年1月)和Cochrane(1966-2006)数据库中搜索了英语文章,以及通过手工搜索相关研究的参考列表和评论文章的书目来补充此内容。旨在评估个别医生在常规实践中的表现的研究也包括在内。两位审稿人使用标准数据抽象表格独立地提取了与研究设计,设置以及与信度,效度,可行性和有效性有关的发现的数据。结果:共有64篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。我们观察到了6种不同的评估表现的方法:模拟患者;模拟患者。视频观察;直接观察;同行评估;审核病历,进行资产组合或评估。就成本和时间而言,同行评估是最可行的方法。迄今为止,几乎没有对仪器进行心理计量评估。形成性评估的有效性研究很少。除2个系统外,所有系统都依靠一种方法来评估性能。讨论:在常规实践中评估医生的表现具有很大的潜力。形成性绩效评估对教育和护理质量的长期影响和有效性仍然鲜为人知。未来的研究设计需要特别注意在提高性能方面的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号