...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers and prevention: A publication of the American Association for Cancer Research >Human aflatoxin albumin adducts quantitatively compared by ELISA, HPLC with fluorescence detection, and HPLC with isotope dilution mass spectrometry.
【24h】

Human aflatoxin albumin adducts quantitatively compared by ELISA, HPLC with fluorescence detection, and HPLC with isotope dilution mass spectrometry.

机译:人黄曲霉毒素白蛋白加合物通过ELISA,带荧光检测的HPLC和带同位素稀释质谱的HPLC进行定量比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Essential to the conduct of epidemiologic studies examining aflatoxin exposure and the risk of heptocellular carcinoma, impaired growth, and acute toxicity has been the development of quantitative biomarkers of exposure to aflatoxins, particularly aflatoxin B(1). In this study, identical serum sample sets were analyzed for aflatoxin-albumin adducts by ELISA, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection (HPLC-f), and HPLC with isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). The human samples analyzed were from an acute aflatoxicosis outbreak in Kenya in 2004 (n = 102) and the measured values ranged from 0.018 to 67.0, nondetectable to 13.6, and 0.002 to 17.7 ng/mg albumin for the respective methods. The Deming regression slopes for the HPLC-f and ELISA concentrations as a function of the IDMS concentrations were 0.71 (r(2) = 0.95) and 3.3 (r(2) = 0.96), respectively. When the samples were classified as cases or controls, based on clinical diagnosis, all methods were predictive ofoutcome (P 0.01). Further, to evaluate assay precision, duplicate samples were prepared at three levels by dilution of an exposed human sample and were analyzed on three separate days. Excluding one assay value by ELISA and one assay by HPLC-f, the overall relative SD were 8.7%, 10.5%, and 9.4% for IDMS, HPLC-f, and ELISA, respectively. IDMS was the most sensitive technique and HPLC-f was the least sensitive method. Overall, this study shows an excellent correlation between three independent methodologies conducted in different laboratories and supports the validation of these technologies for assessment of human exposure to this environmental toxin and carcinogen.
机译:进行流行病学研究以检查黄曲霉毒素的暴露以及肝细胞癌,受损的生长和急性毒性的风险,进行黄曲霉毒素尤其是黄曲霉毒素B(1)暴露定量生物标记的开发至关重要。在这项研究中,通过ELISA,高效液相色谱(HPLC)和荧光检测(HPLC-f)以及同位素稀释质谱法(IDMS)对相同的血清样品组中的黄曲霉毒素-白蛋白加合物进行了分析。分析的人体样品来自2004年在肯尼亚的一次急性黄曲霉菌病暴发(n = 102),每种方法的测量值范围分别为0.018至67.0,不可检测到13.6和0.002至17.7 ng / mg白蛋白。 HPLC-f和ELISA浓度随IDMS浓度变化的Deming回归斜率分别为0.71(r(2)= 0.95)和3.3(r(2)= 0.96)。当根据临床诊断将样本分类为病例或对照时,所有方法均可预测结果(P <0.01)。另外,为了评估测定的准确性,通过稀释暴露的人类样品以三个水平制备重复样品,并在三个独立的天进行分析。不包括ELISA的一项测定值和HPLC-f的一项测定值,IDMS,HPLC-f和ELISA的总体相对SD分别为8.7%,10.5%和9.4%。 IDMS是最敏感的技术,而HPLC-f是最不敏感的方法。总体而言,这项研究显示了在不同实验室中进行的三种独立方法之间的极好的相关性,并支持对这些技术的验证,以评估人类对这种环境毒素和致癌物的暴露程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号