首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Dosimetric comparison of metastatic spinal photon treatment techniques
【24h】

Dosimetric comparison of metastatic spinal photon treatment techniques

机译:脊柱转移光子治疗技术的剂量学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traditional palliative treatment of metastatic cancer to the vertebral bodies often results in doses to the spinal cord that are higher than the dose prescribed to the target, or gross tumor volume (GTV). This study compares traditional techniques of spine palliation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The purpose of the study is 2-fold: first, the study demonstrates the benefits of using IMRT to lower the dose to the organs at risk (OAR), particularly for the spinal cord and other nonspecified normal tissues; second, the article provides information regarding the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used conventional techniques for treating the vertebral bodies based on patient anatomy. Because the use of IMRT or other advanced techniques may be prohibitive because of insurance issues, treatment plans were created that compared optimal coverage vs. optimal sparing for single-field, wedged-pair, and opposed-beam arrangements. Fifty-five patients were selected and divided by location of target (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine) and also by the measured separation between the anterior and posterior surface of the patient at the level of mid-GTV. Within each anatomic category the patients again were divided into the categories of small, medium, and large based on separation. The patient dataset that most closely represented the average separation within each category was selected, resulting in a total of 9 patients, and the appropriate treatment plan techniques were calculated for each of the 9 patients. The results of the study do show that the use of IMRT is far superior when compared with other techniques, both for coverage and for sparing of the surrounding tissue, regardless of patient size and the section of spine being treated. Based on a combination of both target coverage and sparing of normal tissues, the conventional plan of choice may vary by both the section of spine to be treated and by the size of the patient.
机译:对椎体转移性癌症的传统姑息治疗通常会导致脊髓的剂量高于目标剂量或总肿瘤体积(GTV)。这项研究比较了传统的脊柱缓解技术与调强放射疗法(IMRT)。该研究的目的是双重的:首先,该研究证明了使用IMRT降低危险器官(OAR)剂量的好处,特别是对于脊髓和其他未指定的正常组织。其次,本文提供了有关基于患者解剖结构治疗椎体的常用常规技术的优缺点的信息。由于由于保险问题,禁止使用IMRT或其他先进技术,因此制定了治疗计划,该计划比较了单场,楔形对和对射光束布置的最佳覆盖率与最佳备用率。选择了五十五名患者,并按靶标的位置(颈椎,胸椎和腰椎)以及在GTV中水平测量的患者前,后表面之间的距离进行了划分。在每个解剖类别内,根据分离情况将患者再次分为小,中和大三类。选择最能代表每个类别中平均分离度的患者数据集,总共产生9名患者,并为这9名患者中的每位计算适当的治疗计划技术。研究结果的确表明,与IMRT相比,IMRT的使用要好得多,无论覆盖范围和保留周围组织的大小,无论患者的大小和所治疗的脊柱部分如何。基于靶标覆盖范围和正常组织的保留两者的组合,常规的选择方案可能会因要治疗的脊柱截面和患者的身材而异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号