首页> 外文期刊>Medical humanities >Who speaks for whom? Health humanities and the ethics of representation.
【24h】

Who speaks for whom? Health humanities and the ethics of representation.

机译:谁为谁说话?卫生人文科学和代表伦理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The medical or health humanities are in essence a form of advocacy, a means of addressing a problem of underrepresentation. They focus on suffering, rather than pathology, and on sociocultural understandings of illness and disability, rather than a narrow biomedical perspective. The health humanities thus analyse and attempt to recalibrate the power imbalance in healthcare. This article reviews health humanities scholarship that addresses underrepresentation through the analysis of illness and disability narratives. It examines the ethics of representation by exploring how literary representation functions, its aesthetic as well as political dimensions, and how it operates as a relay mechanism for power. The mechanism of representation is further explored through a reading of Eli Clare's narrative Exile and Pride. Donna Haraway's notion of articulations is proposed as a tool for a more ethical approach to representation. The article suggests that transparency about the power health humanities scholars stand to gain through representation may contribute to a more ethical health humanities practice.
机译:医学或健康人文从本质上讲是一种倡导形式,是解决代表性不足问题的一种手段。他们关注的是痛苦而不是病理学,而是对疾病和残疾的社会文化理解,而不是狭bio的生物医学观点。健康人文科学因此分析并且尝试重新校准医疗保健中的功率不平衡。本文回顾了健康人文科学奖学金,该奖学金通过对疾病和残疾叙述的分析来解决代表性不足的问题。它通过探讨文学表征的功能,美学和政治层面以及它如何作为权力的传递机制来研究表征的伦理。通过阅读伊莱·克莱尔(Eli Clare)的叙事《放逐与骄傲》(Exile and Pride),可以进一步探索表征的机制。唐娜·哈拉维(Donna Haraway)的发音概念被提议作为一种更符合伦理学的表达方式的工具。这篇文章表明,关于健康人文学科的学者可以通过代表性获得的力量的透明度,可能有助于更符合伦理道德的健康人文实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号