首页> 外文期刊>Management science: Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences >The Effectiveness of Field Price Discretion: Empirical Evidence from Auto Lending
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Field Price Discretion: Empirical Evidence from Auto Lending

机译:现场价格自由裁量权的有效性:来自汽车贷款的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In many markets, it is common for headquarters to create a price list but grant local salespeople discretion to negotiate prices for individual transactions. How much (if any) pricing discretion headquarters should grant is a topic of debate within many firms. We investigate this issue using a unique data set from an indirect lender with local pricing discretion. We estimate that the local sales force adjusted prices in a way that improved profits by approximately 11% on average. A counterfactual analysis shows that using a centralized, data-driven pricing optimization system could improve profits even further, up to 20% over those actually realized. This suggests that centralized pricing-if appropriately optimized-can be more effective than field price discretion. We discuss the implications of these findings for auto lending and other industries with similar pricing processes.
机译:在许多市场中,总部通常会创建价目表,但授予当地销售人员酌情权以协商单个交易的价格。总部应授予多少定价酌情决定权,这是许多公司争论的话题。我们使用来自间接贷方的独特数据集来调查此问题,该数据集具有本地定价权。我们估计,当地销售人员调整价格的方式可使利润平均提高约11%。反事实分析表明,使用集中的,数据驱动的定价优化系统可以进一步提高利润,最多比实际实现的利润高20%。这表明,如果进行了适当的优化,集中定价将比现场价格决定更为有效。我们讨论了这些发现对具有类似定价过程的汽车贷款和其他行业的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号