...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Clevidipine compared with nitroglycerin for blood pressure control in coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized double-blind study
【24h】

Clevidipine compared with nitroglycerin for blood pressure control in coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized double-blind study

机译:克利夫地平与硝酸甘油的比较在冠状动脉搭桥术中的血压控制:一项随机双盲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: We tested the hypothesis that clevidipine, a rapidly acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is not inferior to nitroglycerin (NTG) in controlling blood pressure before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: In this double-blind study from October 4, 2003 to April 26, 2004, 100 patients undergoing CABG with CPB were randomized at four centres to receive intravenous infusions of clevidipine (0.2-8 μg·kg-1·min-1) or NTG (0.4 μg·kg-1·min-1 to a clinician-determined maximum dose rate) from induction of anesthesia through 12 hr postoperatively. The study drug was titrated in the pre-CPB period with the aim of maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) within ± 5 mmHg of a clinician-predetermined target. The primary endpoint was the area under the curve (AUC) for the total time each patient's MAP was outside the target range from drug initiation to the start of CPB, normalized per hour (AUCMAP-D). The predefined non-inferiority criterion for the primary endpoint was a 95% confidence interval (CI) upper limit no greater than 1.50 for the geometric means ratio between clevidipine and NTG. Results: Total mean [standard deviation (SD)] dose pre-bypass was 4.5 (4.7) mg for clevidipine and 6.9 (5.4) mg for NTG (P 0.05). The geometric mean AUCMAP-D for clevidipine was 283 mmHg·min·hr-1 (n = 45) and for NTG was 292 mmHg·min·hr-1 (n = 48); the geometric means ratio was 0.97 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.27). The geometric mean AUCMAP-D during aortic cannulation was 357.7 mmHg·min·hr-1 for clevidipine compared with 190.5 mmHg·min·hr-1 for NTG. Mean (SD) heart rate with clevidipine was 76.0 (13.8) beats·min-1 compared with 81.5 (14.4) beats·min-1 for NTG. There were no clinically important differences between groups in adverse events. Conclusion: During CABG, clevidipine was not inferior to NTG for blood pressure control pre-bypass.
机译:目的:我们检验了以下假设:在冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)期间进行体外循环(CPB)之前,氯维地平是一种快速起作用的二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂,在控制血压方面不逊于硝酸甘油(NTG)。方法:在2003年10月4日至2004年4月26日的双盲研究中,将100名接受CPB的CABG患者随机分配到四个中心接受氯维地平静脉注射(0.2-8μg·kg-1·min-1)或从麻醉开始至术后12小时,给予NTG(0.4μg·kg-1·min-1至临床医师确定的最大剂量率)。在CPB前阶段对研究药物进行滴定,目的是将平均动脉压(MAP)维持在临床医师预定目标的±5 mmHg之内。主要终点是每位患者的MAP从药物启动到CPB开始的总目标时间超出曲线范围(AUC)的面积(AUCMAP-D)。主要终点指标的预定义非劣效性标准是氯维地平和NTG之间的几何均数比的95%置信区间(CI)上限不大于1.50。结果:氯维地平的总平均[标准偏差(SD)]剂量为氯维地平为4.5(4.7)mg,NTG为6.9(5.4)mg(P <0.05)。氯维地平的几何平均AUCMAP-D为283 mmHg·min·hr-1(n = 45),而NTG的几何平均AUCMAP-D为292 mmHg·min·hr-1(n = 48);几何均值比为0.97(95%CI为0.74至1.27)。氯维地平在主动脉插管过程中的几何平均AUCMAP-D为357.7 mmHg·min·hr-1,而NTG为190.5 mmHg·min·hr-1。氯维地平的平均(SD)心率是76.0(13.8)次·分-1,而NTG为81.5(14.4)次·分-1。不良事件之间两组之间在临床上没有重要的差异。结论:CABG期间,氯比地平在预控制血压方面不逊于NTG。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号