首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Lack of a pre-emptive effect of low-dose ketamine on postoperative pain following oral surgery: (Absence d'effet preventif de faibles doses de ketamine sur la douleur postoperatoire en chirurgie buccale).
【24h】

Lack of a pre-emptive effect of low-dose ketamine on postoperative pain following oral surgery: (Absence d'effet preventif de faibles doses de ketamine sur la douleur postoperatoire en chirurgie buccale).

机译:低剂量氯胺酮对口腔手术后术后疼痛缺乏先发作用:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pre- vs postincisional low-dose iv ketamine on postoperative pain in outpatients scheduled for oral surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: Eighty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenously saline before and after surgery in Group 1, ketamine 300 mug.kg(-1) iv before and saline after surgery in Group 2, saline before and ketamine 300 mug.kg(-1) iv after surgery in Group 3. Postoperative analgesia consisted of iv proparacetamol and ketoprofen. Rescue analgesia consisted of nalbuphine 200 mug.kg(-1) iv. Analgesia at home consisted of oral ketoprofen, and acetaminophen with codeine as rescue analgesia. A telephone interview was conducted on the first and second postoperative days. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups with respect to pain scores, the number of patients requiring nalbuphine in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), (36.7%, 38.7%, and 39.5% for Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively), or nalbuphine consumption in the PACU (66.5 mug.kg(-1) +/- 16.8, 75.9 mug.kg(-1) +/- 17.5, 66.7 mug.kg(-1) +/- 21.6 for Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively). The number of rescue analgesic tablets taken at home, and time to first request for rescue analgesia, sedation scores, or side-effects were similar amongst groups. No patient required nalbuphine in the ambulatory care unit. CONCLUSIONS: There was no benefit to pre-emptive administration of ketamine 300 mug.kg(-1) iv whether administered pre- or postoperatively.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估切开术前和术后低剂量静脉注射氯胺酮对计划在全身麻醉下进行口腔手术的门诊患者术后疼痛的影响。方法:第1组静脉内氯胺酮300马克·公斤(-1)静脉滴注术前及术后84例患者,第2组静脉内术前及氯胺酮300马克·公斤(-)静脉滴注手术前及术后静脉注射生理盐水。 1)第3组在手术后进行静脉输注。术后镇痛包括静脉输注扑热息痛和酮洛芬。抢救镇痛包括纳布啡200 mug.kg(-1)iv。在家中的镇痛包括口服酮洛芬,对乙酰氨基酚和可待因作为急救镇痛。术后第一天和第二天进行电话采访。结果:各组之间在疼痛评分,麻醉后监护病房(PACU)中需要纳布啡的患者人数方面无显着差异(第1、2和3组分别为36.7%,38.7%和39.5%)或PACU中的纳布啡消费量(第1组,分别为66.5 mug.kg(-1)+/- 16.8、75.9 mug.kg(-1)+/- 17.5、66.7 mug.kg(-1)+/- 21.6) 2和3)。各组之间在家服用急救镇痛片的数量以及首次请求急救镇痛的时间,镇静分数或副作用相似。在门诊病房中没有患者需要纳布啡。结论:无论是术前还是术后,先发制人氯胺酮300 mug.kg(-1)均无益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号