首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens: (L'analgesie au remifentanil controlee par le patient pour le travail obstetrical : l'optimisation des regimes d'administration des medicaments).
【24h】

Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens: (L'analgesie au remifentanil controlee par le patient pour le travail obstetrical : l'optimisation des regimes d'administration des medicaments).

机译:瑞芬太尼分娩自控镇痛药:优化药物给药方案:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: A pilot study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of two regimens of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with remifentanil for labour analgesia. METHODS: Twenty term parturients requesting labour analgesia were randomized to receive one of two regimens of intravenous remifentanil. The initial settings in both groups consisted of an infusion of 0.025 mug.kg(-1).min(-1), a PCA bolus of 0.25 mug.kg(-1) and a lockout interval of two minutes. In Group A, the infusion was increased in a stepwise manner from 0.025 to 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 mug.kg(-1).min(-1) as required; the bolus was kept constant at 0.25 mug.kg(-1). In Group B, the bolus was increased from 0.25 to 0.5, 0.75 and 1 mug.kg(-1) as necessary; the infusion was kept constant at 0.025 mug.kg(-1).min(-1). Maternal pain, satisfaction and sedation scores, remifentanil requirement, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: Mean pain and patient satisfaction scores, and cumulative doses of remifentanil were similar in the two groups. The overall incidence of side effects was greater in Group B (P = 0.0007), with drowsiness observed in 100% of patients, as compared to 30% in Group A (P = 0.003). The minimum oxygen saturation levels were 94.3% +/- 2.6% and 92.2% +/- 3.8% in Groups A and B respectively (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Although pain and satisfaction scores were similar in both groups, the regimen used in Group A was associated with fewer side effects compared to the Group B dosing regimen. This pilot study suggests that remifentanil intravenous PCA is efficacious for labour analgesia as a bolus of 0.25 mug.kg(-1), with a lockout interval of two minutes and continuous infusion of 0.025-0.1 mug.kg(-1).min(-1). The potential for respiratory depression mandates close respiratory monitoring. Large-scale trials to evaluate safety issues are warranted.
机译:目的:进行了一项初步研究,以比较两种静脉自控镇痛(PCA)和瑞芬太尼进行分娩镇痛的方案的疗效。方法:二十名要求分娩镇痛的足月产妇被随机分配接受两种瑞芬太尼静脉注射方案之一。两组的初始设置包括输注0.025 mug.kg(-1).min(-1),PCA推注量0.25 mug.kg(-1)和2分钟的锁定时间。在A组中,根据需要将输注量从0.025逐步增加到0.05、0.075和0.1 mug.kg(-1).min(-1);推注保持恒定在0.25 mug.kg(-1)。在B组中,按需将推注量从0.25增加到0.5、0.75和1 mug.kg(-1);输注保持恒定在0.025 mug.kg(-1).min(-1)。记录产妇的疼痛,满意度和镇静分数,瑞芬太尼需要量以及副作用。结果:两组的平均疼痛和患者满意度评分以及瑞芬太尼的累积剂量相似。 B组的总体副作用发生率较高(P = 0.0007),100%的患者出现嗜睡现象,而A组的副作用为30%(P = 0.003)。 A组和B组的最低氧饱和度分别为94.3%+/- 2.6%和92.2%+/- 3.8%(P = 0.19)。结论:尽管两组的疼痛和满意度得分相似,但是与B组给药方案相比,A组使用的方案副作用更少。这项初步研究表明,瑞芬太尼静脉内PCA以0.25马克·千克(-1)的推注方式对分娩镇痛有效,锁定间隔为2分钟,并连续输注0.025-0.1马克·千克(-1)。分钟( -1)。潜在的呼吸抑制作用要求密切的呼吸监测。评估安全问题的大规模试验是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号