首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia: (Le recrutement alveolaire ameliore l'efficacite ventilatoire des poumons pendant l'anesthesie).
【24h】

Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia: (Le recrutement alveolaire ameliore l'efficacite ventilatoire des poumons pendant l'anesthesie).

机译:肺泡募集可提高麻醉期间的肺通气效率:(肺泡募集可改善麻醉期间的肺通气效率)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to analyze the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), with and without a lung recruitment maneuver, on dead space. METHODS: 16 anesthetized patients were sequentially studied in three steps: 1) without PEEP (ZEEP), 2) with 5 cm H(2)O of PEEP and 3) with 5 cm H(2)O of PEEP after an alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS). Ventilation was maintained constant. The single breath test of CO(2) (SBT-CO(2)), arterial oxygenation, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory compliance were recorded every 30 min. RESULTS: Physiological dead space to tidal volume decreased after ARS (0.45 +/- 0.01) compared with ZEEP (0.50 +/- 0.07, P < 0.05) and PEEP (0.51 +/- 0.06, P < 0.05). The elimination of CO(2) per breath increased during PEEP (25 +/- 3.3 mL*min(-1)) and ARS (27 +/- 3.2 mL*min(-1)) compared to ZEEP (23 +/- 2.6 mL*min(-1), P < 0.05), although ARS showed larger values than PEEP (P < 0.05). Pa-etCO(2) difference was lower after recruitment (0.9 +/- 0.5 kPa, P < 0.05) compared to ZEEP (1.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) and PEEP (1.2 +/- 0.5 kPa). Slope II increased after ARS (63 +/- 11%/L, P < 0.05) compared with ZEEP (46 +/- 7.7%/L) and PEEP (56 +/- 10%/L). Slope III decreased significantly after recruitment (0.13 +/- 0.07 1/L) compared with ZEEP (0.21 +/- 0.11 1/L) and PEEP (0.18 +/- 0.10 1/L). The angle between slope II and III decreased only after ARS. After lung recruitment, PaO(2), EELV, and compliance increased significantly compared with ZEEP and PEEP. CONCLUSION: Lung recruitment improved the efficiency of ventilation in anesthetized patients.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是分析有无肺募集动作时呼气末正压(PEEP)对死腔的影响。方法:对16名麻醉患者按以下三个步骤进行了依次研究:1)无PEEP(ZEEP),2)5 cm H(2)O的PEEP和3)5 cm H(2)O的肺泡募集策略(ARS)。通风保持恒定。每30分钟记录一次CO(2)(SBT-CO(2))的单次呼吸测试,动脉氧合,呼气末肺体积(EELV)和呼吸顺应性。结果:与ZEEP(0.50 +/- 0.07,P <0.05)和PEEP(0.51 +/- 0.06,P <0.05)相比,ARS(0.45 +/- 0.01)后潮气量的生理死区减少。与ZEEP(23 +/-)相比,PEEP(25 +/- 3.3 mL * min(-1))和ARS(27 +/- 3.2 mL * min(-1))期间每次呼吸的CO(2)消除增加。 2.6 mL * min(-1),P <0.05),尽管ARS的值大于PEEP(P <0.05)。与ZEEP(1.1 +/- 0.5 kPa)和PEEP(1.2 +/- 0.5 kPa)相比,募集后(0.9 +/- 0.5 kPa,P <0.05)Pa-etCO(2)的差异更低。与ZEEP(46 +/- 7.7%/ L)和PEEP(56 +/- 10%/ L)相比,ARS后的坡度II增加了(63 +/- 11%/ L,P <0.05)。与ZEEP(0.21 +/- 0.11 1 / L)和PEEP(0.18 +/- 0.10 1 / L)相比,招募后(坡度III)(0.13 +/- 0.07 1 / L)的坡度III显着降低。仅在ARS之后,坡度II和III之间的角度才减小。肺募集后,与ZEEP和PEEP相比,PaO(2),EELV和顺应性显着增加。结论:肺部募集改善了麻醉患者的通气效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号