...
【24h】

Office-based anesthesia.

机译:基于办公室的麻醉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Ambulatory office-based anesthesia (OBA) is a relatively new but rapidly growing field. OBA requires a different approach than that used in the hospital, because there are unique considerations that must be recognized when administering anesthesia in a free-standing office facility. This review provides a summary of the important issues and aspects of safe patient care. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, Biological Abstract, Science Citation Index, and Healthstar databases were searched under the key words "office-based anesthesia" for relevant English language articles from 1966 to December 2008. Relevant publications were queried from governing institutions, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), as well as from colleges in various provinces across Canada. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Office-based anesthesia remains poorly regulated in many parts of Canada (and the US). Despite continuing concerns regarding patient safety, the rates of death and reported major complications for OBA appear to be very low, especially in accredited facilities. Multiple considerations for facility design, administration, and patient care need to be taken into account. CONCLUSION: Appropriately so, an increasing number of provinces (Canada) and states (US) are beginning to regulate office-based facilities and require accreditation.
机译:目的:基于办公室的门诊麻醉(OBA)是一个相对较新但发展迅速的领域。 OBA需要的方法与医院使用的方法不同,因为在独立式办公室中进行麻醉时必须考虑一些独特的注意事项。这篇综述总结了安全病人护理的重要问题和方面。方法:以关键词“办公室麻醉”为关键词,检索1966年至2008年12月的Medline,Embase,生物学摘要,Science Citation Index和Healthstar数据库。向相关管理机构查询相关出版物,例如美国麻醉医师学会(ASA),以及加拿大各省的大学。主要发现:在加拿大(和美国)的许多地区,办公室麻醉的监管仍然很差。尽管持续关注患者的安全性,OBA的死亡率和报告的主要并发症似乎很低,尤其是在经过认可的机构中。需要考虑设施设计,管理和患者护理的多种考虑。结论:适当地,越来越多的省(加拿大)和州(美国)开始规范办公设施并需要认证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号