首页> 外文期刊>Frontline gastroenterology >Risk assessment in acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding: the AIMS65 score in comparison with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in a Scottish population
【24h】

Risk assessment in acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding: the AIMS65 score in comparison with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in a Scottish population

机译:急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的风险评估:苏格兰人群的AIMS65评分与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction The early use of risk stratification scores is recommended for patients presenting with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal (Gl) bleeds (ANVGIB). AIMS65 is a novel, recently derived scoring system, which has been proposed as an alternative to the more established Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS). Objective To validate the AIMS65 scoring system in a predominantly Caucasian population from Scotland and compare it with the GBS. Design Retrospective study of patients presenting to a district general hospital in Scotland with a suspected diagnosis of ANVGIB who underwent inpatient upper Gl endoscopy between March 2008 and March 2013.
机译:简介对于有急性非静脉曲张性上消化道(Gl)出血(ANVGIB)的患者,建议及早使用风险分层评分。 AIMS65是一种新颖的,最近派生的评分系统,已被提议作为更成熟的格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分(GBS)的替代方法。目的在苏格兰的高加索人群中验证AIMS65评分系统,并将其与GBS进行比较。设计回顾性研究,对2008年3月至2013年3月间接受住院的上GI内镜检查的苏格兰地区综合医院就诊的疑似ANVGIB患者进行了回顾性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号